3dmark '03 FX5900 Ultra - please post your 3dmark scores here :D

Hi, I would like to compare my 3dmarks to other users with similar hardware.
I got 5627 with the following setup:

AthlonXP 3000+ @2.25ghz (fsb overclocked to 340mhz)
Soltek KT400-C
MSI FX5900 Ultra 256mb @ stock speed
1GB (2x512mb) Corsair TwinX DDR333 memory

Mine is about the same

Daniel

"mimayin" <> wrote in message
news:ca4hgt$vn6$...
> Hi, I would like to compare my 3dmarks to other users with similar
hardware.
> I got 5627 with the following setup:
>
> AthlonXP 3000+ @2.25ghz (fsb overclocked to 340mhz)
> Soltek KT400-C
> MSI FX5900 Ultra 256mb @ stock speed
> 1GB (2x512mb) Corsair TwinX DDR333 memory
>
>
>

"mimayin" <> wrote in message
news:ca4hgt$vn6$...
> Hi, I would like to compare my 3dmarks to other users with similar
hardware.
> I got 5627 with the following setup:
>
> AthlonXP 3000+ @2.25ghz (fsb overclocked to 340mhz)
> Soltek KT400-C
> MSI FX5900 Ultra 256mb @ stock speed
> 1GB (2x512mb) Corsair TwinX DDR333 memory
>
>
>

Why not post your compare URL too?

Athlon 64 FX51 @ 2.21 ghz
MSI K8T Master2-FAR
Albatron FX5900 Turbo @ 433/850
1GB (2X512mb) Corsair registered DDR-SDRAM

3dMark 03 = 5872


On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 15:09:40 +0100, "mimayin" <>
wrote:

>Hi, I would like to compare my 3dmarks to other users with similar hardware.
>I got 5627 with the following setup:
>
>AthlonXP 3000+ @2.25ghz (fsb overclocked to 340mhz)
>Soltek KT400-C
>MSI FX5900 Ultra 256mb @ stock speed
>1GB (2x512mb) Corsair TwinX DDR333 memory
>
>

"mimayin" <> wrote in message news:ca4hgt$vn6$...
> Hi, I would like to compare my 3dmarks to other users with similar hardware.
> I got 5627 with the following setup:
>
> AthlonXP 3000+ @2.25ghz (fsb overclocked to 340mhz)
> Soltek KT400-C
> MSI FX5900 Ultra 256mb @ stock speed
> 1GB (2x512mb) Corsair TwinX DDR333 memory
>

5912. I closed down all startup progs and non-microsoft services unrelated to nVidia.

MSI FX5900U-VTD256
P4 3Ghz (FSB 400Mhz)
1GB Kingston HyperX (2x 512MB PC3500)

Asus P4C800E-D

Tony.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1917528
3dMark 2003 score: 6686
FX-51 overclocked to 2.275 ghz
MSI K8T800 Master 2-FAR
GeForce 5950 ultra (301mhz/983mhz) driver version 53.03
1 gig (2 x 512) Corsair TwinX DDR333

"mimayin" <> wrote in message
news:ca4hgt$vn6$...
> Hi, I would like to compare my 3dmarks to other users with similar
hardware.
> I got 5627 with the following setup:
>
> AthlonXP 3000+ @2.25ghz (fsb overclocked to 340mhz)
> Soltek KT400-C
> MSI FX5900 Ultra 256mb @ stock speed
> 1GB (2x512mb) Corsair TwinX DDR333 memory
>
>
>

I get 6097 with only a FX5800Ultra and a 533Mhz P4 2.8!!
No overclocking!!
I thought the FX5900 was supposed to be faster?

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2252154

GigaByte GA-8IHXP P4 Titan
Intel P4 2.8Ghz 533FSB
512Mb PC1066 Rambus RDRAM
Fujitsu 36Gb Ultra-160 SCSI
DVD Rom
CD-RW
nVidia FX5800Ultra 128Mb
WindowsXP Home

v56k wrote:
>
> I get 6097 with only a FX5800Ultra and a 533Mhz P4 2.8!!
> No overclocking!!
> I thought the FX5900 was supposed to be faster?
>
> http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2252154
>
> GigaByte GA-8IHXP P4 Titan
> Intel P4 2.8Ghz 533FSB
> 512Mb PC1066 Rambus RDRAM
> Fujitsu 36Gb Ultra-160 SCSI
> DVD Rom
> CD-RW
> nVidia FX5800Ultra 128Mb
> WindowsXP Home
>

And to add to the AGP 4x v 8x debate I only use 4x!!

"v56k" <> wrote in message
news:Hzzxc.17103654$.. .
> v56k wrote:
> >
> > I get 6097 with only a FX5800Ultra and a 533Mhz P4 2.8!!
> > No overclocking!!
> > I thought the FX5900 was supposed to be faster?
> >
> > http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2252154
> >
> > GigaByte GA-8IHXP P4 Titan
> > Intel P4 2.8Ghz 533FSB
> > 512Mb PC1066 Rambus RDRAM
> > Fujitsu 36Gb Ultra-160 SCSI
> > DVD Rom
> > CD-RW
> > nVidia FX5800Ultra 128Mb
> > WindowsXP Home
> >
>
> And to add to the AGP 4x v 8x debate I only use 4x!!

thats some fill rate you have on that card!! 14969.2 vs 2578.1 on me 9700
Pro. I got no where near that with my FX5900 either!

I am looking at your 3dMark project and see high mhz for your video card.
Does your video card run stock at 501mhz/999mhz?
By the way, It makes sense for a 5800ultra to outperform a 5900 but who
knows?
And a 533FSB 2.8ghz P4 is no slouch! Well except compared to an FX51, hehe

I wonder how much difference that 4x/8x AGP setting you mention makes? Why
faster when set lower?


"v56k" <> wrote in message
news:WIyxc.17100435$.. .
>
> I get 6097 with only a FX5800Ultra and a 533Mhz P4 2.8!!
> No overclocking!!
> I thought the FX5900 was supposed to be faster?
>
> http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2252154
>
> GigaByte GA-8IHXP P4 Titan
> Intel P4 2.8Ghz 533FSB
> 512Mb PC1066 Rambus RDRAM
> Fujitsu 36Gb Ultra-160 SCSI
> DVD Rom
> CD-RW
> nVidia FX5800Ultra 128Mb
> WindowsXP Home
>