On 14 Jun 2005 00:09:51 -0700, "larry moe 'n curly"
<> wrote:
>kony wrote:
>> On 13 Jun 2005 12:30:22 -0700, "larry moe 'n curly"
>> <> wrote:
>
>> >1. Does the PC Chips M825g mobo have built-in CPU overheat
>> >protection?
>>
>> It's supposed to, as are all boards adhering to AMD's spec
>> for Socket A after (a certain point in time, about 3 years
>> ago, IIRC). I can't confirm that it does though, and
>> suggest you look again at the bios pages and motherboard
>> manual.
>
>Neither the manual nor the new BIOS (May 2005, replacing July 2004)
>mention anything about CPU thermal protection, and it wouldn't surprise
>me if this mobo didn't follow AMD specs because I found that all the
>fuses for the keyboard, mouse, and USB ports were replaced with jumper
>wires.
We should all be thankful that the board costs 25 cents less
I suppose... It's really sad how little some parts
omissions save. If PCCHips had a mind to, they could take
the mid-grade market easily by simply making decent boards.
>> I would be more concerned about proper cooling subsystem
>> design and good fan selection. It is rare for good, low RPM
>> fans to die. Don't use cheap, off-brand (meaning anything
>> not bearing a _fan_ manufacturer's label, not a 3rd party
>> label like Coolermaster or Antec or ???. While those two
>> and others do sell some products with decent fans, you don't
>> have an assurance of the actual fan they relabeled in all
>> cases (situations). Instead trust Nidec, NMB, Papst,
>> Panaflo, Sanyo, Delta, et al.
>
>Oddly, the only CPU fans to give me trouble were all Deltas provided
>with retail boxed AMD CPUs. Years ago, five K6-2 CPUs fans squealed
>loudly beause their rear sleeve bearings hadn't been lubed at the
>factory. Every Delta fan vibrated, and the one included with my Athlon
>XP1800+ was so bad that I asked AMD replaced it, but the replacement
>vibrated the same. OTOH the same heatsink sold by Coolermaster with a
>Coolermaster-labelled fan was buzz-free. I was also happy that this
>Sempron 3000+ came with a smooth-running fan, labelled AVS.
Were they thin(ner) fans? I omitted that important detail,
that the thin fans seem shortest lived. Thick, slow,
largest diameter possible... will probably be one of the
last parts to fail instead of one of the first. I still
have 10+ year old Panaflos that run great, even being
sleeve-bearing.
>
>I use an overtemperature shutoff device consisting of a quad comparator
>and some thermistors and have it monitor the CPU, graphics chip, and
>hard drives.
I may get motivated towards doing something like that,
though at present I've been trusting the board's shutoff
mechanism, and never having had to rely on it as I am quite
picky about the fans I used. When sleeve-bearing, they get
a special homebrew synthetic oil/grease lube that even
manages to keep those crappy Yate Loon fans running after
they'd seized up and fried power supplies... not that I'd
reuse them, but is all part of my ongoing effort to ensure
that (the odds are low) of my ever having to depend on a
thermal shutdown. Funny thing is that my volt-modded FX5900
video card probably produces more heat than anything else
but has the smallest fan (strapped onto a solid copper 1U
Xeon 'sink). It'll probably snap in half some day from the
weight of that 'sink, LOL.
|