Careful! Haven't you used a trademark without the authorization of its owner:
Wow! ... Ben Myers
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:43:19 -0600, Journey <> wrote:
>On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 08:15:06 -0500, "Tom Scales" <>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>> From: RnR [private.php?do=newpm&u=]
>>> Thanks. I won't get less than 53" for the living room. There is a
>>> rule of thumb about viewing distance and the recommended size of
>>> screen but I forgot right now but I calculated around 50+ at the time
>>> I read it. I'll get serious about researching all of this when I get
>>> closer to the time I want to buy. Actually the Sony I have now is a
>>> very nice screen but when my wife and I watch nature shows, I'm aware
>>> the larger screen will look even better (assuming the resolution,
>>> etc... are on par with the Sony). As to how much I want to spend,
>>> that's easy, very little .... I want to live on champagne or better
>>> with a beer budget.
>>
>>I have all sizes, up to 63". The sweet spot is 46-52 or so.
>>
>>Vizio has a new 52" LCD with full 1080P support for just $2200 list
>>price. I suspect it is spectacular, particularly given the price. We
>>have two of the 32" Vizio 720P sets ($499 on sale) and they may be the
>>best sets in the house. Certainly the best value for the money.
>>
>>I'm partial to Samsung and Vizio.
>
>Samsung sure seems to have its act together. I used to think of it as
>a Korean Japanese-wannabe company, but it surpasses many of its
>Japanese competitors.
>
>When I looked at Vizio I didn't like the appearance. The particular
>model had an inverted bezel on the bottom (lol try to figure that
>out). Also, two display models at SAMS had volume problems, which of
>course doesn't necessarily mean anything but it made a negative
>impression on me.
>
>I am about 10' away from my 42" 1080p Westinghouse. When I use it
>with HDTV channels, the size seems about right, although a 47" would
>add to a "wow" experience. When not in HDTV wide mode, I would like a
>larger screen. I am happy that I at least got this size because if I
>would have gotten something smaller I would have a lot of regrets.
>
>I could be wrong but I think you had mentioned the Westinghouse Tom so
>thank you for that, and also for your recommendation to keep things
>simple and go with the cable TV company's PVR. For $14 / month it
>does what I want it to.
|