cracked LCD

"BillW50" <> wrote in message
news:452259fd$0$1352$. com...
> M.I.5¾ wrote:
>> "BillW50" <> wrote in message
>> news:452233ae$0$1346$. com...
>>> Patryk has mentioned at least twice, there is no signs of any impact
>>> damage. Take it back Patryk and get that screen replaced for free.
>>
>> Yes he has. His discription of the cracks is, "... few cracks
>> spreading from one point." That one point is the impact point.
>
> Once again I read it differently. Here is what Patryk said:
>
> wrote:
>> But after one week the new lcd cracked, it has few cracks spreading
>> from one point. There are no damages on the surface of the screen. I
>> think it's not my fault beacuse I didin't do anything unusual with my
>> laptop, I didn't hit the screen with anything, there are no marks on
>> the surface on both sides.
>
>
> wrote:
>> But how to explan that the surface of the screen isn't damaged, and
>> when I opened the lid there where no objects between screen and the
>> keyborad.
>
> So I see either the tech bent the screen to get it in there, or it had a
> small crack before the tech even had his/her hands on it. And once a crack
> in glass starts, or usually only gets worse.
>

But such cracks don't radiate from one point.

M.I.5¾ napisal(a):
> But such cracks don't radiate from one point.

I'll try to send a photo of my notebooks lcd later.

And I have another question, the lcd hac another fault, when the
background is black and I move a white object(eg. mouse pointer) over
it the screen it leaves a red mark which fades in time and it says for
about 1 second. This only happens in left bottom part of the screen ?
What could it be ?

"M.I.5¾" <_SPAM.co.uk> wrote in message
news:45235332$
> "BillW50" <> wrote in message
> news:452259fd$0$1352$. com...
>> M.I.5¾ wrote:
>>> "BillW50" <> wrote in message
>>> news:452233ae$0$1346$. com...
>>>> Patryk has mentioned at least twice, there is no signs of any
>>>> impact damage. Take it back Patryk and get that screen replaced
>>>> for free.
>>>
>>> Yes he has. His discription of the cracks is, "... few cracks
>>> spreading from one point." That one point is the impact point.
>>
>> Once again I read it differently. Here is what Patryk said:
>>
>> wrote:
>>> But after one week the new lcd cracked, it has few cracks spreading
>>> from one point. There are no damages on the surface of the screen. I
>>> think it's not my fault beacuse I didin't do anything unusual with
>>> my laptop, I didn't hit the screen with anything, there are no
>>> marks on the surface on both sides.
>>
>>
>> wrote:
>>> But how to explan that the surface of the screen isn't damaged, and
>>> when I opened the lid there where no objects between screen and the
>>> keyborad.
>>
>> So I see either the tech bent the screen to get it in there, or it
>> had a small crack before the tech even had his/her hands on it. And
>> once a crack in glass starts, or usually only gets worse.
>>
>
> But such cracks don't radiate from one point.

Every crack in glass I ever seen does.

--
Bill

<> wrote in message
news: ups.com...
M.I.5¾ napisal(a):
> But such cracks don't radiate from one point.

I'll try to send a photo of my notebooks lcd later.

And I have another question, the lcd hac another fault, when the
background is black and I move a white object(eg. mouse pointer) over
it the screen it leaves a red mark which fades in time and it says for
about 1 second. This only happens in left bottom part of the screen ?
What could it be ?

---------------------------------

Your screen is cracked. In some parts, the LCD characteristics have changed
because the front glass is no longer the correct distance from the rear
glass.

"BillW50" <> wrote in message
news:45239bb3$0$1349$. com...
> "M.I.5¾" <_SPAM.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:45235332$
>> "BillW50" <> wrote in message
>> news:452259fd$0$1352$. com...
>>> M.I.5¾ wrote:
>>>> "BillW50" <> wrote in message
>>>> news:452233ae$0$1346$. com...
>>>>> Patryk has mentioned at least twice, there is no signs of any
>>>>> impact damage. Take it back Patryk and get that screen replaced
>>>>> for free.
>>>>
>>>> Yes he has. His discription of the cracks is, "... few cracks
>>>> spreading from one point." That one point is the impact point.
>>>
>>> Once again I read it differently. Here is what Patryk said:
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>> But after one week the new lcd cracked, it has few cracks spreading
>>>> from one point. There are no damages on the surface of the screen. I
>>>> think it's not my fault beacuse I didin't do anything unusual with
>>>> my laptop, I didn't hit the screen with anything, there are no
>>>> marks on the surface on both sides.
>>>
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>> But how to explan that the surface of the screen isn't damaged, and
>>>> when I opened the lid there where no objects between screen and the
>>>> keyborad.
>>>
>>> So I see either the tech bent the screen to get it in there, or it
>>> had a small crack before the tech even had his/her hands on it. And
>>> once a crack in glass starts, or usually only gets worse.
>>>
>>
>> But such cracks don't radiate from one point.
>
> Every crack in glass I ever seen does.
>

I have seen numerous cracked LCD screens (we have thousands of them here).
The pattern of cracks from impact damage on the screen face is very
different from cracks from a screen that is dropped or excessively
distorted.

"M.I.5¾" <_SPAM.co.uk> wrote in message
news:4524a8cd$
> I have seen numerous cracked LCD screens (we have thousands of them
> here). The pattern of cracks from impact damage on the screen face is
> very different from cracks from a screen that is dropped or
> excessively distorted.

Well I guess we need to see the photos. And do I understand correctly,
the inside glass is broke and not the outside one?

--
Bill

wrote:
> hello
> I have recenty had my notebooks lcd replaced (as part of the
> guarantee).
> But after one week the new lcd cracked, it has few cracks spreading
> from one point. There are no damages on the surface of the screen. I
> think it's not my fault beacuse I didin't do anything unusual with my
> laptop, I didn't hit the screen with anything, there are no marks on
> the surface on both sides.
> I suspect that the new LCD was mounted badly so it cracked form small
> wibrations during carrying it in the bag.
>
> My question is: do I have any chace to convince the producer on my
> laptop that it was their fault ?
> Is this possible that it was their fault ?
>
> Patryk
>

There is no reason an LCD should only last a week if you haven't abused
it. By all means, try to get it fixed on warranty again.

BillW50 napisal(a):
> "M.I.5¾" <_SPAM.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:4524a8cd$
> > I have seen numerous cracked LCD screens (we have thousands of them
> > here). The pattern of cracks from impact damage on the screen face is
> > very different from cracks from a screen that is dropped or
> > excessively distorted.
>
> Well I guess we need to see the photos. And do I understand correctly,
> the inside glass is broke and not the outside one?


Yes, the surface is OK, only cracks inside

And this is a photo of my LCD

http://img512.imageshack.us/img512/7978/dsc00595hr5.jpg

Patryk

Can you post a photo where there is an open full-screen window (word or
outlook or something) on the screen? It almost looks in that photo
(where the screen is all black anyway) like the actual LCD panel is not
cracked.


wrote:

> BillW50 napisal(a):
>
>>"M.I.5¾" <_SPAM.co.uk> wrote in message
>>news:4524a8cd$
>>
>>>I have seen numerous cracked LCD screens (we have thousands of them
>>>here). The pattern of cracks from impact damage on the screen face is
>>>very different from cracks from a screen that is dropped or
>>>excessively distorted.
>>
>>Well I guess we need to see the photos. And do I understand correctly,
>>the inside glass is broke and not the outside one?
>
>
>
> Yes, the surface is OK, only cracks inside
>
> And this is a photo of my LCD
>
> http://img512.imageshack.us/img512/7978/dsc00595hr5.jpg
>
> Patryk
>