"Martin Falardeau" <> wrote in
news:J6und.34718$:
> If it's wrong,
> why you not telling how to know if memory module is ECC or not instead
> of just saying wrong ???
>
> "PJx" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:58:12 -0500, "Martin Falardeau"
>> <> wrote:
>>
>>>No it's not an ECC memory module since it have 8 chips on each side.
>>>From what i know, ECC module have a number of chip that can be
>>>divided by 3 or 5,
>>>right?
>>
>> WRONG!
>>
>
>
This used to be the rule of thumb but it's getting real difficult to
determine the memory chips from control chips. Easily confused.
You can determine if your system has parity by simply counting the number
of black memory chips on each module. Parity (and ECC) memory modules
have a chip count divisible by three or five. Any chip count not
divisible by three or five indicates a non-parity memory module.
Anyway, a more correct statement would have been that if you are mixing
parity with non parity, buffered with unbuffered, SPD with non-SPD you
would surely be causing system farkes. You could try to vary the memory
settings in BIOS to see if you can get the newer module to work alone.
From there see if you can work the older module in. Remember also that
you need to remove power from an ATX powered system to change the RAM.
Not doing so could render damage to the RAM or mainboard.
|