On 7/29/2011 3:35 PM, Bert Hyman wrote:
> In news:j0v55c$5je$ BillW50<> wrote:
>
>> Acronis True Image (has a 15 day trial version available)
>> http://www.acronis.com/homecomputing...cts/trueimage/
>
> Last time I looked, the trial version was fully functional, so if you
> move fast ...
>
> Still, I paid for it and use it for my nightly backups :-)
I bought Acronis True Image 2009 and 2011 and I hate both of them. And
not too much difference between the two versions actually. Acronis True
Image for many years has had problems with some USB controllers. Oh they
backup to any of them just fine. Just when restoring they can't find
some of the drives. Some others, some days they can see them and
sometimes they can't. Not good at all.
I also use Paragon products and they are about the same as Acronis True
Image. Although no USB controller problem. Paragon full backups are
fine, but incremental backups takes forever (much longer than a full
backup actually). Acronis True Image is far better for incremental.
Otherwise not much of a difference.
Nowadays I only use Acronis True Image just for cloning. And Acronis
True Image can't clone live (under Windows). Although Paragon and
XXClone can and does. Nowadays I don't make backups, but I clone instead
and use the clone drives. I have about 5 drives that I rotate.
I didn't think XXClone was going to be too good, but I was surprised how
well it works and it is only 1.6MB in size. The commercial version will
also do incremental cloning which is like unheard of. And unlike Acronis
True Image and Paragon, has nothing running in the background when the
application isn't running.
--
Bill
Gateway M465e ('06 era) - Thunderbird v3.0
Centrino Core Duo 1.83G - 2GB - Windows XP SP3