Motherboard Forums


Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Intel is rumored to have struck a deal with Sony to provide LarrabeeGPU for PlayStation4

 
 
AirRaid
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-07-2009, 03:37 AM


Intel is shooting for PlayStation 4, but has it scored?

A new rumor suggests that Intel has succeeded in its efforts to place
its forthcoming discrete GPU product, codenamed Larrabee, in the next
generation of Sony's PlayStation game console.
By Jon Stokes | Last updated February 6, 2009 2:20[/b]


I've known for a while, and even mentioned on Ars, that Intel has a
team that's actively courting the Sony PlayStation 4 contract, and
Intel VP Pat Gelsinger affirmed to me in an interview that the company
would love to be in a next-generation console. But The Inquirer's
Charlie Demerjian has published a whale of a post-CES rumor claiming
that Intel's forthcoming Larrabee GPU did indeed score the GPU spot on
Sony's next-gen console.

There will be a ton of skepticism over this, and for good reason—I
myself have actually had informal, off-the-record conversations that
indicate to me that there may not be a lot of love for Intel on the
technical front inside of Sony. But this rumor has a lot going for it.
I'll enumerate the plusses and minuses below, but before jumping in
let's hand the mic over to official Sony PR for their take.
Jon Stokes


"We do not comment on rumors and speculations. Our utmost priority is
to further increase the installed base for PS3 and PSP, with more new
and exciting entertainment and services (game/non-game and package/
network)," a Sony spokesperson told Ars. "PS3 is still in its third
year from launch and it is too premature to talk about the next-
generation home platform. At this time, nothing concrete has been
decided."

I actually believe that nothing concrete has been decided. But Sony
may be leaning one way or the other. Let's look at the forces at work.
It's all about the (rapidly shrinking) bottom line

The number one, overriding factor in any decision that Sony makes
right now is money—and I don't mean, "how will we grow our console
marketshare and conquer the living room," but "how will we stop
hemorrhaging money and ensure that, whatever happens with the next
generation of consoles, we attain profitability with the PS4 as
quickly as possible." Given this new reality, I find Charlie's claim
that Intel essentially bought its way into the PS4—technical
considerations be damned—very convincing.

This "ten-year console" stuff, where Sony looks at a console's overall
profitability over the course of a decade? That's the kind of thing
you can afford to do when you're not staring into the abyss. Intel has
deep enough pockets and enough fab capacity to take a real hit to its
margins on Larrabee and offer Sony a cheap GPU with guaranteed
availability. If any semi maker is going to survive this recession and
come out the other side still fully invested in the success of a
discrete graphics product, it will be Intel.

As for the Kuturagi-style grand visions of Pixar-quality graphics in
the living room, and networked consoles all changing the way we
entertain ourselves, that, too, is bull-market bull. With the PS4,
Sony will just want to stay in the game, and have a very quick path to
profitability. One might even go so far as to say that, at this point,
Sony execs probably wish they had gone the Wii route.

Note that these same financial pressures also drastically change the
cross-platform development equation from the console vendor's
perspective. In the distant, more profit-friendly past past of early
2008, console makers still courted exclusive titles, and Sony in
particular counted it as a major plus that games optimized to take
full advantage of PS3 wouldn't be easily portable to Xbox or the PC.

But in today's world of shrinking margins, Sony's incentives have
shifted 180 degrees, and with Larrabee (especially if it's paired with
a Nehalem-derived CPU), Sony can actually boast, "write it once, run
it on the PlayStation 4 and the PC," to developers.

To sum up, Sony has paid a heavy price for its efforts to attract
exclusive titles to the PS3 by promising developers superior visuals,
and that's a price that the company cannot afford to pay with its next
console.
What about Cell?

My guess is that if Sony were free to fantasize about the console that
it would ideally like to produce with PS4, it would probably just
double down on Cell. And why not? The same things that make Cell hard
to program will also plague Larrabee. The programming problems that
come with the many-core paradigm—a paradigm that both Cell and
Larrabee fit under—are fundamental, algorithm-level design problems
that are essentially ISA-indifferent. (Yes, this is a shift from my
previous "x86 will own the GPU stance.")

So Sony could safely just do more of Cell with PS4 by just increasing
the number of dedicated vector units and general-purpose cores. This
would also give the company free backwards compatibility with existing
PS3 titles, and, of course, enable it to leverage existing investments
in the PS3 developer toolchain and in Cell itself.

Ultimately, the question of which horse Sony bets on next hinges on
the numbers, and specifically on whether Intel is able to paint
Larrabee as the cheaper option going forward, even when the cost of
ditching the hardware and software investment in Cell is factored in.


http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2...-it-scored.ars
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Bigguy
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-15-2009, 03:23 PM
AirRaid wrote:
>
> Intel is shooting for PlayStation 4, but has it scored?
>
> A new rumor suggests that Intel has succeeded in its efforts to place
> its forthcoming discrete GPU product, codenamed Larrabee, in the next
> generation of Sony's PlayStation game console.
> By Jon Stokes | Last updated February 6, 2009 2:20[/b]
>
>
> I've known for a while, and even mentioned on Ars, that Intel has a
> team that's actively courting the Sony PlayStation 4 contract, and
> Intel VP Pat Gelsinger affirmed to me in an interview that the company
> would love to be in a next-generation console. But The Inquirer's
> Charlie Demerjian has published a whale of a post-CES rumor claiming
> that Intel's forthcoming Larrabee GPU did indeed score the GPU spot on
> Sony's next-gen console.
>
> There will be a ton of skepticism over this, and for good reason—I
> myself have actually had informal, off-the-record conversations that
> indicate to me that there may not be a lot of love for Intel on the
> technical front inside of Sony. But this rumor has a lot going for it.
> I'll enumerate the plusses and minuses below, but before jumping in
> let's hand the mic over to official Sony PR for their take.
> Jon Stokes
>
>
> "We do not comment on rumors and speculations. Our utmost priority is
> to further increase the installed base for PS3 and PSP, with more new
> and exciting entertainment and services (game/non-game and package/
> network)," a Sony spokesperson told Ars. "PS3 is still in its third
> year from launch and it is too premature to talk about the next-
> generation home platform. At this time, nothing concrete has been
> decided."
>
> I actually believe that nothing concrete has been decided. But Sony
> may be leaning one way or the other. Let's look at the forces at work.
> It's all about the (rapidly shrinking) bottom line
>
> The number one, overriding factor in any decision that Sony makes
> right now is money—and I don't mean, "how will we grow our console
> marketshare and conquer the living room," but "how will we stop
> hemorrhaging money and ensure that, whatever happens with the next
> generation of consoles, we attain profitability with the PS4 as
> quickly as possible." Given this new reality, I find Charlie's claim
> that Intel essentially bought its way into the PS4—technical
> considerations be damned—very convincing.
>
> This "ten-year console" stuff, where Sony looks at a console's overall
> profitability over the course of a decade? That's the kind of thing
> you can afford to do when you're not staring into the abyss. Intel has
> deep enough pockets and enough fab capacity to take a real hit to its
> margins on Larrabee and offer Sony a cheap GPU with guaranteed
> availability. If any semi maker is going to survive this recession and
> come out the other side still fully invested in the success of a
> discrete graphics product, it will be Intel.
>
> As for the Kuturagi-style grand visions of Pixar-quality graphics in
> the living room, and networked consoles all changing the way we
> entertain ourselves, that, too, is bull-market bull. With the PS4,
> Sony will just want to stay in the game, and have a very quick path to
> profitability. One might even go so far as to say that, at this point,
> Sony execs probably wish they had gone the Wii route.
>
> Note that these same financial pressures also drastically change the
> cross-platform development equation from the console vendor's
> perspective. In the distant, more profit-friendly past past of early
> 2008, console makers still courted exclusive titles, and Sony in
> particular counted it as a major plus that games optimized to take
> full advantage of PS3 wouldn't be easily portable to Xbox or the PC.
>
> But in today's world of shrinking margins, Sony's incentives have
> shifted 180 degrees, and with Larrabee (especially if it's paired with
> a Nehalem-derived CPU), Sony can actually boast, "write it once, run
> it on the PlayStation 4 and the PC," to developers.
>
> To sum up, Sony has paid a heavy price for its efforts to attract
> exclusive titles to the PS3 by promising developers superior visuals,
> and that's a price that the company cannot afford to pay with its next
> console.
> What about Cell?
>
> My guess is that if Sony were free to fantasize about the console that
> it would ideally like to produce with PS4, it would probably just
> double down on Cell. And why not? The same things that make Cell hard
> to program will also plague Larrabee. The programming problems that
> come with the many-core paradigm—a paradigm that both Cell and
> Larrabee fit under—are fundamental, algorithm-level design problems
> that are essentially ISA-indifferent. (Yes, this is a shift from my
> previous "x86 will own the GPU stance.")
>
> So Sony could safely just do more of Cell with PS4 by just increasing
> the number of dedicated vector units and general-purpose cores. This
> would also give the company free backwards compatibility with existing
> PS3 titles, and, of course, enable it to leverage existing investments
> in the PS3 developer toolchain and in Cell itself.
>
> Ultimately, the question of which horse Sony bets on next hinges on
> the numbers, and specifically on whether Intel is able to paint
> Larrabee as the cheaper option going forward, even when the cost of
> ditching the hardware and software investment in Cell is factored in.
>
>
> http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2...-it-scored.ars


I don't think Sony has the money to develop a PS4.

G
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Jack
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-15-2009, 05:19 PM
Bigguy wrote:
:: AirRaid wrote:

<snip>
::
:: I don't think Sony has the money to develop a PS4.

Not only do you lamers x-post this dribble like crazy, but then you add
insult to injury to not trim the post with the equally lame, one-liner
reply. What a bunch of idiots!


 
Reply With Quote
 
Robert Miles
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-16-2009, 09:44 PM
"Bigguy" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> AirRaid wrote:
>>
>> Intel is shooting for PlayStation 4, but has it scored?
>>
>> A new rumor suggests that Intel has succeeded in its efforts to place
>> its forthcoming discrete GPU product, codenamed Larrabee, in the next
>> generation of Sony's PlayStation game console.
>> By Jon Stokes | Last updated February 6, 2009 2:20[/b]
>>
>>
>> I've known for a while, and even mentioned on Ars, that Intel has a
>> team that's actively courting the Sony PlayStation 4 contract, and
>> Intel VP Pat Gelsinger affirmed to me in an interview that the company
>> would love to be in a next-generation console. But The Inquirer's
>> Charlie Demerjian has published a whale of a post-CES rumor claiming
>> that Intel's forthcoming Larrabee GPU did indeed score the GPU spot on
>> Sony's next-gen console.
>>
>> There will be a ton of skepticism over this, and for good reason—I
>> myself have actually had informal, off-the-record conversations that
>> indicate to me that there may not be a lot of love for Intel on the
>> technical front inside of Sony. But this rumor has a lot going for it.
>> I'll enumerate the plusses and minuses below, but before jumping in
>> let's hand the mic over to official Sony PR for their take.
>> Jon Stokes
>>
>>
>> "We do not comment on rumors and speculations. Our utmost priority is
>> to further increase the installed base for PS3 and PSP, with more new
>> and exciting entertainment and services (game/non-game and package/
>> network)," a Sony spokesperson told Ars. "PS3 is still in its third
>> year from launch and it is too premature to talk about the next-
>> generation home platform. At this time, nothing concrete has been
>> decided."
>>
>> I actually believe that nothing concrete has been decided. But Sony
>> may be leaning one way or the other. Let's look at the forces at work.
>> It's all about the (rapidly shrinking) bottom line
>>
>> The number one, overriding factor in any decision that Sony makes
>> right now is money—and I don't mean, "how will we grow our console
>> marketshare and conquer the living room," but "how will we stop
>> hemorrhaging money and ensure that, whatever happens with the next
>> generation of consoles, we attain profitability with the PS4 as
>> quickly as possible." Given this new reality, I find Charlie's claim
>> that Intel essentially bought its way into the PS4—technical
>> considerations be damned—very convincing.
>>
>> This "ten-year console" stuff, where Sony looks at a console's overall
>> profitability over the course of a decade? That's the kind of thing
>> you can afford to do when you're not staring into the abyss. Intel has
>> deep enough pockets and enough fab capacity to take a real hit to its
>> margins on Larrabee and offer Sony a cheap GPU with guaranteed
>> availability. If any semi maker is going to survive this recession and
>> come out the other side still fully invested in the success of a
>> discrete graphics product, it will be Intel.
>>
>> As for the Kuturagi-style grand visions of Pixar-quality graphics in
>> the living room, and networked consoles all changing the way we
>> entertain ourselves, that, too, is bull-market bull. With the PS4,
>> Sony will just want to stay in the game, and have a very quick path to
>> profitability. One might even go so far as to say that, at this point,
>> Sony execs probably wish they had gone the Wii route.
>>
>> Note that these same financial pressures also drastically change the
>> cross-platform development equation from the console vendor's
>> perspective. In the distant, more profit-friendly past past of early
>> 2008, console makers still courted exclusive titles, and Sony in
>> particular counted it as a major plus that games optimized to take
>> full advantage of PS3 wouldn't be easily portable to Xbox or the PC.
>>
>> But in today's world of shrinking margins, Sony's incentives have
>> shifted 180 degrees, and with Larrabee (especially if it's paired with
>> a Nehalem-derived CPU), Sony can actually boast, "write it once, run
>> it on the PlayStation 4 and the PC," to developers.
>>
>> To sum up, Sony has paid a heavy price for its efforts to attract
>> exclusive titles to the PS3 by promising developers superior visuals,
>> and that's a price that the company cannot afford to pay with its next
>> console.
>> What about Cell?
>>
>> My guess is that if Sony were free to fantasize about the console that
>> it would ideally like to produce with PS4, it would probably just
>> double down on Cell. And why not? The same things that make Cell hard
>> to program will also plague Larrabee. The programming problems that
>> come with the many-core paradigm—a paradigm that both Cell and
>> Larrabee fit under—are fundamental, algorithm-level design problems
>> that are essentially ISA-indifferent. (Yes, this is a shift from my
>> previous "x86 will own the GPU stance.")
>>
>> So Sony could safely just do more of Cell with PS4 by just increasing
>> the number of dedicated vector units and general-purpose cores. This
>> would also give the company free backwards compatibility with existing
>> PS3 titles, and, of course, enable it to leverage existing investments
>> in the PS3 developer toolchain and in Cell itself.
>>
>> Ultimately, the question of which horse Sony bets on next hinges on
>> the numbers, and specifically on whether Intel is able to paint
>> Larrabee as the cheaper option going forward, even when the cost of
>> ditching the hardware and software investment in Cell is factored in.
>>
>>
>> http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2...-it-scored.ars

>
> I don't think Sony has the money to develop a PS4.
>
> G


..
Any idea whether the Larrabee will be compatible with PS3GRID, now
renamed GPUGRID, one of the sources of heavy users of PS3s?

R


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PlayStation4 update: Larrabee or no Larrabee, Sony undecided AirRaid Nvidia 2 02-25-2009 10:47 PM
Intel is rumored to have struck a deal with Sony to provide LarrabeeGPU for PlayStation4 AirRaid ATI 3 02-16-2009 09:44 PM
Intel is rumored to have struck a deal with Sony to provide LarrabeeGPU for PlayStation4 AirRaid Nvidia 3 02-16-2009 09:44 PM
SONY Patents for PlayStation4 ~ PS4 ?? a link to the past Nvidia 7 04-30-2005 05:27 AM
Nvidia-Sony deal and CELL could extend to PSP-2 and Playstation4 a link to the past Nvidia 2 04-27-2005 12:52 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:50 AM.


Welcome!
Welcome to Motherboard Point
 

Advertisment