Motherboard Forums


Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

K7S5A Pro and Boot Device Failure

 
 





















skippi
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-19-2004, 06:41 PM


I just built a Windows 2000 system around a K7S5A Pro (Version 5) using the
e030811s.rom (BIOS). Every so often almost immediately upon boot up I get a
"boot device failure" error. I then hit ctrl-alt-del and it (usually) goes
on to boot normally. I have thoroughly checked out the Western Digital hard
drive (Norton Disk Doctor, etc.) and have found no problems with it. (The
only other "symptom" is that when the system does boot into Windows 2000 it
takes several minutes (2-3) for it to reach the desktop. It sort of "hangs"
for a couple of minutes at the Windows 2000 splash screen and the status bar
stays at the half-way mark for quite some time. Once into windows everything
runs perfectly.)

Is this a motherboard problem or a hard drive problem? If it's the mb is
there a BIOS setting or update or tweak I need to check out? If the hard
drive is "marginal" I suppose I can wait until it fails, but I would like to
track down and isolate the problem.

NOTE: Here are some things that are *not* the problem. It is not a virus or
spyware or adware or too many programs loading at Windows startup. I have
already checked for these issues. The system is clean. The install of
Windows 2000 is new and all patches and updates have been done.

Thanks!


 
Reply With Quote
 
Kylesb
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-19-2004, 06:50 PM
Interestingly I recently had similar problems with a WD 80Gig wd800jb
HD. Search Usenet and you should find my posts and responses. I did
not find a solution, but the HD works perfectly with another mobo.
What I found was if I stalled the HD boot (enter BIOS setup or boot to
a floppy) for a few minutes, then performed a soft-boot, then win2k
booted properly. You might try using master/slave jumper settings
instead of cableselect. I was using cable select at the time.

--
Best regards,
Kyle
"skippi" <> wrote in message
news:_7rnd.68296$SW3.34083@fed1read01...
| I just built a Windows 2000 system around a K7S5A Pro (Version 5)
using the
| e030811s.rom (BIOS). Every so often almost immediately upon boot up
I get a
| "boot device failure" error. I then hit ctrl-alt-del and it
(usually) goes
| on to boot normally. I have thoroughly checked out the Western
Digital hard
| drive (Norton Disk Doctor, etc.) and have found no problems with it.
(The
| only other "symptom" is that when the system does boot into Windows
2000 it
| takes several minutes (2-3) for it to reach the desktop. It sort of
"hangs"
| for a couple of minutes at the Windows 2000 splash screen and the
status bar
| stays at the half-way mark for quite some time. Once into windows
everything
| runs perfectly.)
|
| Is this a motherboard problem or a hard drive problem? If it's the
mb is
| there a BIOS setting or update or tweak I need to check out? If the
hard
| drive is "marginal" I suppose I can wait until it fails, but I would
like to
| track down and isolate the problem.
|
| NOTE: Here are some things that are *not* the problem. It is not a
virus or
| spyware or adware or too many programs loading at Windows startup. I
have
| already checked for these issues. The system is clean. The install
of
| Windows 2000 is new and all patches and updates have been done.
|
| Thanks!
|
|

 
Reply With Quote
 
Smoker
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-20-2004, 10:21 AM

"skippi" <> wrote in message
news:_7rnd.68296$SW3.34083@fed1read01...
> I just built a Windows 2000 system around a K7S5A Pro (Version 5) using

the
> e030811s.rom (BIOS). Every so often almost immediately upon boot up I get

a
> "boot device failure" error. I then hit ctrl-alt-del and it (usually) goes
> on to boot normally. I have thoroughly checked out the Western Digital

hard
> drive (Norton Disk Doctor, etc.) and have found no problems with it. (The
> only other "symptom" is that when the system does boot into Windows 2000

it
> takes several minutes (2-3) for it to reach the desktop. It sort of

"hangs"
> for a couple of minutes at the Windows 2000 splash screen and the status

bar
> stays at the half-way mark for quite some time. Once into windows

everything
> runs perfectly.)
>
> Is this a motherboard problem or a hard drive problem? If it's the mb is
> there a BIOS setting or update or tweak I need to check out? If the hard
> drive is "marginal" I suppose I can wait until it fails, but I would like

to
> track down and isolate the problem.
>
> NOTE: Here are some things that are *not* the problem. It is not a virus

or
> spyware or adware or too many programs loading at Windows startup. I have
> already checked for these issues. The system is clean. The install of
> Windows 2000 is new and all patches and updates have been done.
>
>>> Is this a motherboard problem or a hard drive problem? <<<


It can be a combination of both.

K7S5A has a BIOS drive recognition problem. It doesn't happen very often and
after playing with it, it goes away without you knowing what you may have
done to fix it when it could have just been time alone that fixed it like
the lost CMOS problem. There isn't a fix, it just comes and goes, not
limited to hard drives or only WD.

However, WD is the most notorious of brands for not being recognized by any
motherboard. This became particularly apparent when the nForce 2 boards
first came out. Those boards had an obvious BIOS problem, but every forum
you looked on had a bunch of complaints about WD drives not being
recognized.

The fix that always worked was to (perform surgery) cut the first two wires
of your ribbon cable. WD is aware and has a special cable they'll send you
for free if only you can convince them that every fix they recommend doesn't
work, and you'll really have to beg for it. They work hard at keeping it
private that their drives have this problem. It's most common (and maybe
exclusive) to the 8MB cache drives.

When windows starts up quite slowly it's often caused by your network
settings... or lack of them, i.e., no IP numbers.

To determine what is causing your slow boot time, download a free app called
BLA (bootlog analyzer). This will show you things that startup and quit that
you never heard of and the time each item takes. I think if NDIS..something
is one of the long times indicated, it's your network. Only look at the
Delays, you will see "Failed" in places which is because something is only
useful for a second or so, and Failed usually means the same as Ended or
Quit.

There are various numbers that work to put into your DNS/IP that don't
affect anything. I use these which stop my Win98 from taking an extra 30
seconds to start up without affecting anything else . . .

192.168.255.0 for IP Address
255.255.255.0 for Subnet Mask

In your Network settings, click on your NIC to highlight it then click on
Properties, then the IP Address tab and choose to specify an IP Address.
When I do a clean install this is one of the first things I change because
the time delay can drive you batty since you'll be installing so many things
and having to reboot after.


 
Reply With Quote
 
skippi
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-20-2004, 04:11 PM
I just wanted to say thanks to kyle and smoker. Your answers are very
informative and have helped to "solve" (i.e., provide a work around for)
this problem.


 
Reply With Quote
 
Kylesb
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-20-2004, 08:45 PM
Well, why not share which "workaround" actually worked with the rest
of us?

--
Best regards,
Kyle
"skippi" <> wrote in message
news:k1Knd.69673$SW3.37677@fed1read01...
| I just wanted to say thanks to kyle and smoker. Your answers are
very
| informative and have helped to "solve" (i.e., provide a work around
for)
| this problem.
|
|

 
Reply With Quote
 
skippi
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-21-2004, 09:32 PM
>"Kylesb" wrote
> Well, why not share which "workaround" actually worked with the rest
> of us?
>

Sure. By lengthening the boot up process (going into BIOS and disabling
quick boot) the system has time to find the hard drive. So far this works.

The rest of the information given answers what I suspected and have read
elsewhere; namely, the K7S5A series has some minor bugs and the Western
Digital hard drives do as well. My "solution" will be to only buy Intel or
Asus boards and Seagate hard drives. But, I got the K7S5A Pro WITH and
Athlon 2400+ XP CPU for $50! So, I can live with the minor glitches.
Everything else seems stable on the system. As long as the ECS board works
well otherwise I'll let it "live" but if it acts up in any other way I'll
put it out of my misery.

(If I wanted to fix the other slowdown, caused by the network, I would
probably disable the onboard LAN and install a better NIC to see if that
worked. But, like I said, after the 3-5 minute overall boot up, the system
is clean and quiet. Also, another work around would be to never shut the
system down. Then you would not have the slow start-up problem. With Windows
2000 this would be fine.)

Again, thanks for all the help and information!


 
Reply With Quote
 
Kylesb
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-22-2004, 04:09 AM
"skippi" <> wrote in message
news:OP7od.73263$SW3.42845@fed1read01...
| >"Kylesb" wrote
| > Well, why not share which "workaround" actually worked with the
rest
| > of us?
| >
| Sure. By lengthening the boot up process (going into BIOS and
disabling
| quick boot) the system has time to find the hard drive. So far this
works.
|
| The rest of the information given answers what I suspected and have
read
| elsewhere; namely, the K7S5A series has some minor bugs and the
Western
| Digital hard drives do as well. My "solution" will be to only buy
Intel or
| Asus boards and Seagate hard drives. But, I got the K7S5A Pro WITH
and
| Athlon 2400+ XP CPU for $50! So, I can live with the minor glitches.
| Everything else seems stable on the system. As long as the ECS board
works
| well otherwise I'll let it "live" but if it acts up in any other way
I'll
| put it out of my misery.
|
| (If I wanted to fix the other slowdown, caused by the network, I
would
| probably disable the onboard LAN and install a better NIC to see if
that
| worked. But, like I said, after the 3-5 minute overall boot up, the
system
| is clean and quiet. Also, another work around would be to never shut
the
| system down. Then you would not have the slow start-up problem. With
Windows
| 2000 this would be fine.)
|
| Again, thanks for all the help and information!
|
|

FWIW, the onboard SIS LAN always worked beautifully for me with my
local network, but I use static IPs assigned to all my machines to
avoid any IP assignment problems/delays.
--
Best regards,
Kyle

 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:27 AM.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43