In article <>, Ed
<> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 00:29:26 -0500, (Paul) wrote:
>
>
> >
> >Sorry. I thought you were referring to the motherboards having a
> >different number of DIMM slots or something.
> >
> >If you are referring to the "speed table" in the Asus manual,
> >that is a function of the processor. See page 16 of the AMD datasheet:
> >
>
>http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/cont...docs/24659.PDF
> >
> >The rules in that table should apply to any motherboard with that
> >processor. That is why Asus copied the table into their manual.
> >
> >Page 32 of the MSI manual, contains the same table:
> >
> >http://download.msi.com.tw/support/m.../E6702v1.1.zip
> >
> >HTH,
> > Paul
>
> Paul,
> I have 3 SS DDR 400 sticks,
>
> the MSI board shows,
> D S S DDR400
> S S S DDR400
>
> The K8V only shows DDR 333 support for 3 dimms,
> correct me if I am wrong.
>
> Thanks,
> Ed
You are right. It looks like MSI decided to embellish the table.
Asus looks closer to the AMD provided table than MSI. (Not that I
plan on verifying each and every entry - I used to get paid to
do stuff like that :-) The stuff in the MSI table looks like
things I would try, based on the other entries. For example, if
a mobo offers "D x D", then a natural assumption is that "S S D"
or maybe "D S S" would work also. That is why, no matter what
rules are stated in the table, you won't really know until you
try it.
Normally, a company like AMD will provide design rules for
laying out the board. They will include track dimensions,
spacing, copper stackup, matching requirement (delta between
signals), and so on. If both companies follow the same design
rules, they should have matching RAM population tables.
And, we all know how the motherboard companies stand by their
predictions of how many and what type of RAM can be used <VBG>.
Paul