"Tom Cole" <> wrote in message
news:...
> On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:05:09 -0500, RnR <> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:24:27 +1300, Tom Cole
>><> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:43:41 -0500, RnR <> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 10:57:40 -0500, "S.Lewis"
>>>><> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"alien" <> wrote in message
>>>>>news:gcd7mm$mdn$.. .
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "M" <> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:...
>>>>>>> I have just bought a Dell XPS laptop but am unable to connect to my
>>>>>>> wireless network unless I remove the security settings.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It will connect OK when the security type is set to no
>>>>>>> authentication
>>>>>>> with the corresponding setting on the 3COM router however will not
>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>> with WPA encryption. The network adaptor is an Intel WiFi Link
>>>>>>> 4965AGN.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The router settings are:
>>>>>>> Router settings (OfficeConnect 3COM ADSL Wireless 11g Firewall
>>>>>>> Router)
>>>>>>> PPPoA
>>>>>>> Channel: Auto
>>>>>>> SSID Broadcast: Enable
>>>>>>> Wireless Mode: 11g Only (also tried Mixed 11b + 11g and long rang
>>>>>>> mixed
>>>>>>> 11b + 11g)
>>>>>>> g Nitro Enable (disabling does not make a difference)
>>>>>>> WPA: WPA-PSK (no server) The only other WPA available is with Radius
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I believe that all the other router settings are correct as they
>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>> with the laptop with the WPA taken off.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have another desktop which connects wirelessly its settings are:
>>>>>>> Windows XP
>>>>>>> Raling RT2500 Wireless LAN Card
>>>>>>> Network Authentication WPA-PSK
>>>>>>> Data encryption TKIP
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The laptop does not offer the exact corresponding settings
>>>>>>> The network adaptor is an Intel WiFi Link 4965AGN
>>>>>>> This connected OK when the security type was set to no
>>>>>>> authentication
>>>>>>> with the corresponding setting on the 3COM router however will not
>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>> with security type set to WPA-Personal (there is not WPA-PSK) with
>>>>>>> Encryption type TKIP. I have tried all of the other WPA options.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As part of the set up I created a new 63 digit key and applied it to
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> router, the wireless desktop and the laptop. This was done as a
>>>>>>> copy and
>>>>>>> paste using a USB key and Notepad. I have taken care to not to miss
>>>>>>> off
>>>>>>> any of the leading or trailing characters or to include any spaces.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It basically looks like this Dell wont work with WPA-PSK. Can
>>>>>>> anyone
>>>>>>> advise a work around that doesn't compromise security and doesn't
>>>>>>> involve
>>>>>>> a new router or using and Express card.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think I'd ditch the 63 digit key for now and try setting it up with
>>>>>> something like 1234 as the key. That way you don't have to cut and
>>>>>> paste
>>>>>> anything in case that might be messing something up. Then if it
>>>>>> works
>>>>>> with the small key you could try a bigger one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> alien
>>>>>>
>>>>>> alien
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Not a bad idea either, though I'd probably try a 20-30 character
>>>>>generated
>>>>>WPA-PSK key.
>>>>>
>>>>>Sometimes those full key lengths can blow things up.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Going along these lines, I read that you could use WEP but change the
>>>>password weekly. Of course I prefer WPA if available as would most
>>>>others.
>>>
>>>There are tools available on the internet which will crack WEP in about
>>>a minute. WEP is simply not secure.
>>
>>
>>No argument but the average person doesn't know how to use them
>>(packet sniffers) so I hesitate to say WEP is not secure. I'd rather
>>say it has weak security at least when compared to WPA. BTW, I read
>>a while back even WPA is crackable so when you define secure, you
>>better also relate that to what degree of security. Otherwise
>>someone else can come along and say WPA isn't secure either.
>
> WPA is only insecure with a weak or short password (see below).
>>
>>Bottom line is, secure or not secure depends on the situation. WEP
>>might be fine in a home network in a small populated place but I
>>wouldn't recommend it for an apartment, major city or for storing
>>sensitive files on the network.
>>
>>Last I agree WEP is not a preferable level of encryption if WPA is
>>available but it's better than nothing <grin> .
>
> If you are concerned about the security of your WEP network you should
> consider upgrading its components to support at least WPA.
>
> The only time you can crack the WPA pre-shared key is if it is a
> dictionary word or relatively short in length. Conversely, if you want
> to have an unbreakable wireless network at home, use WPA/WPA2 and a 63
> character password composed of random characters including special
> symbols. There is a suitable random key generator at
> https://www.grc.com/passwords.htm
Then again you can limit the IP range on the router and use MAC Filters.