On 6/23/12 10:19 AM, in article
fmoore-, "Fred Moore"
<> wrote:
> In article <michelle->,
> Michelle Steiner <> wrote:
>
>> In article <js3fi8$f7o$>, Don Bruder <>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> You may recall that about two months ago I mentioned that my iPad's
>>>> screen
>>>> is polarized so that when I look at it while wearing my polarized
>>>> sunglasses, the screen is blanked when held vertically.
>>>
>>> *EVERY* LCD in existence is polarized. It's a side-effect of how they
>>> function. The only question is which way you have to turn each one to
>>> get it to "go blank" or otherwise distort while wearing your particular
>>> pair of polarized shades.
>>
>> Well, in the case of the iPhone, it doesn't go blank regardless of which
>> way you turn it. I was pointing that out as well as the orientations to
>> blank the screens of the other devices I mentioned. I was in no way
>> suggesting that those were the only LCD devices that are polarized.
>
> Polarized sunglasses are vertically polarized because the reflected
> 'glare' from roadways and other objects tends to be mostly horizontally
> polarized. Perhaps with your iPhone retina display Apple is somehow
> using 'circular' polarization
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_polarization> a much more
> complicated phenomenon, but that's beyond the scope of my physic course
> recollection.
Circular polarization is the only useful kind when metering light through a
camera internally, like a DSLR. It doesn't skew the reading like linear
does.