In article <vilain->,
Michael Vilain <> wrote:
> In article <kurt.r.todoroff->,
> "Kurt R. Todoroff" <> wrote:
>
> > In article <kurt.r.todoroff->,
> > "Kurt R. Todoroff" <> wrote:
> >
> > > I installed Lion on my girlfriend's iMac (27-inch, 4GB RAM) on Saturday,
> > > my father's iMac (20-inch, 3GB RAM) on Saturday, and my two iMacs
> > > (27-inch, 8GB RAM) yesterday.
> > >
> > > When I launch Address Book and Activity Monitor on my two iMacs, Address
> > > Book's memory usage increases rapidly until I quit it. I have watched
> > > it increased to over 4GB within less than fifteen minutes. Once its
> > > memory usage passes a certain point, the hard drive activity becomes
> > > quite vigorous and loud, which I assume is rapid page swaps. The Mac's
> > > responsiveness declines rapidly as AB uses more memory. Once the memory
> > > manager starts banging the hard drive, it takes five to ten minutes for
> > > even a small memory footprint application like TextEdit to quit.
> > >
> > > When I launch Address Book and Activity Monitor on either of my
> > > girlfriend's iMac or my father's iMac, its memory usage remains constant
> > > at around 43MB for the entire day.
> > >
> > > Has anyone experienced this? I've searched for this problem, but have
> > > only read that Apple plugged some memory leaks in 10.7.2 in Safari and
> > > Time Machine. The significant difference between our systems is that my
> > > AB contains 3,600 contacts, whereas, theirs contain less than 200 each.
> > > Each of their Macs reside at home, and both use iCloud to sync with
> > > their respective iPhones and her iPad. One of my iMacs resides at home,
> > > the other at my small business. Both of them sync to iCloud and my
> > > iPhone.
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> >
> > I posted the original message on Tuesday.
> >
> > On Wednesday, I decided to refrain from launching Address Book when I
> > arrived at work (with the other applications that I use frequently
> > throughout the day), and instead, just use it as needed and then quit
> > it. My Quad-Core iMac's speed returned.
> >
> > This worked fine for several hours. Then my iMac began to act sluggish
> > again. I launched Activity Monitor. A new process,
> > AddressBookSyncSource, was behaving in the same manner that Address Book
> > had been. That is, its memory usage was increasing rapidly and so was
> > its CPU usage. I let it cook for a while, and then it terminated after
> > a couple of hours. My Mac returned to normal.
> >
> > On Thursday, I launched my usual applications except for Address Book,
> > when I arrived at my business. About four hours later my iMac began to
> > act sluggish. I checked Activity Monitor. Sure enough,
> > AddressBookSourceSync was running and using large amounts of system
> > resources. It's still running as I type this. Seeing how its memory
> > usage is approaching 6GB, I will restart my iMac after I post this
> > message.
> >
> > A Google search returned very little information on
> > AddressBookSourceSync. Is anyone familiar with it?
> >
> > Thank you.
>
> Not seen this behavior on my 10.6.8 Quadcore MacPro system. I don't
> have as many entries in my Address Book as you do, but I do see
> WebServices ballon to 2GB of memory allocation and deflate with usage.
> The difference between previous versions of MacOS X and 10.6 is that the
> virtual memory swap files grow and diminish as well as memory is used.
> For the most part, it hasn't been a problem. I'm not running a big
> workload of memory hungry applications, so my system isn't as loaded as
> yours.
>
> What are you sync'ing with, just out of curiousity? AFIAK, the calendar
> and address book sync with the iphone and itouch. In 10.7, I understand
> iCloud is also sync'd. Maybe that's what's going on? Do you have any
> sort of network traffic monitor to look at what's going on (Little
> Snitch or RubberNet)?
>
> I'd post this on any of the Apple Fora for developers to examine. Here
> we can only commiserate or corroborate anything you find. Apple doesn't
> monitor news feeds. If you're on AppleCare (if you're a business user,
> you should be), submit a support ticket to have someone in Engineering
> explain this behavior to you.
Hi Michael,
I'll take a look at Little Snitch and RubberNet. And, thank you for the
suggestion to post the problem for developers to examine.
The name of the process is interesting: AddressBookSourceSync. My iCal
contains approximately 30,000 items, however, it's performance as
displayed in Activity Monitor seems reasonable.
Thank you.
--
Kurt Todoroff
Markets, not mandates and mob rule.
Consent, not coercion.