mm wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 03:19:23 -0500, Paul <> wrote:
>
>> mm wrote:
>>> BTW, I forgot to offer thanks for any help with these questions and
>>> those in the prior two threads. I know it's not "required", but
>>> still.
>>> .....
>>> I kept looking and found one page with a bunch of stores that sell
>>> CT12864Z335, and so far none say whether it is low density or not,
>>> maybe because they are relying on the Crucial page for info?
>>> http://www.shopwiki.com/_1GB+333MHZ+...+-+CT12864Z335
>>>
>>> OTOH, here's a webpage that maybe sells only low-density memory!
>>> (At least I suppose they mark it if it's not.)
>>> http://low-density.memorycheap.us/10...AM_Memory.html
>>> And it does list it. But they might be wrong too.
Why doesn't
>>> Crucial say?
>> An alternate way of determining density, is to use the markings
>> on the module.
>>
>> http://img.systemaxdev.com/productme...1/134916-1.jpg
>>
>> CT12864Z335.16TFY <--- The Crucial sticker
>>
>> It's possible the 16TFY would be a giveaway. The 16 part is
>> used to detect double sided memory (8 chipset per side).
>
> So are you saying that if there are 16 chips, it's low density?
>
> OT:
> I like this line from wikip: "In the past, registered memory was
> called buffered memory and unregistered memory was called unbuffered
> memory. Registered memory got renamed in common use, but unbuffered
> memory did not."
>
>> I don't
>> have a table that says what TFY stands for. (It might even be
>> the chip revision used.)
>>
>> To zero in on the Micron sticker, I used the Micron UDIMM table,
>> matching part numbers against what I could read on the label.
>> My conclusion is, it's likely this one.
>>
>> Micron MT16VDDT12864AY-335F2 <--- The Micron (parent company) sticker
>> PC2700U-25331-Z
>>
>> http://www.micron.com/partscatalog.h..._modules/udimm
>>
>> http://cache.micron.com/Protected/ex...28_256x64A.pdf
>
> This one expired by the time I looked at it, but I found
> http://www.micron.com/products/Produ...DDT12864AY-335
> for the same DDR, MT16VDDT12864AY-335F2, and it too, for
> specifications, says:
> Density: 1GB
> Technology: DDR SDRAM
> RoHS: Yes
> Part Status: EOL Pending
> Comp. Count: 16
> Depth: 128Mb
> Width: x64
> Pin Count: 184-pin
> Op. Temp.: 0C to +70C
> Data Rate: 333 MT/s
> Speed: PC2700
> CL: CL = 2.5
> Voltage: 2.5V
> Comp. Config: 64 Meg x 8
> ECC: Non ECC
> Module Ranks: Dual Rank
>
> They really make it hard.
>
>> On page 2 of the DD16C64_128_256x64A.pdf document, middle column
>> corresponds to the 1GB UDIMM.
>>
>> "Parameter 1GB
>>
>> Device configuration 512Mb (64 Meg x 8)"
>>
>> The alternatives are 64Mx8 (low density) and 128Mx4 (high density). So the
>> Micron datasheet says it's low density.
>
> Wow. It shouldn't be this much effort, should it?
>
>> You can also contact Crucial pre-sales, and the staff there can help
>> you with issues like this.
>
> Well, there was a question about this very item, answered by a Crucial
> employee, but he didn't actually answer the question! If he added
> that last line that you included, it would have been clear and I
> wouldn't have posted.
>
> http://www.forums.crucial.com/t5/Sta...ity/td-p/18386
> 09-04-2010 06:38 PM
> Can someone advise me if the above mentioned Crucial part no 1GB
> PC2700 DIMM is low density or high density ? TIA. (476 Views)
>
> Reply 09-08-2010 10:15 AM
> Hello,
> All Crucial 1GB unbuffered non-ECC DDR modules are going to be 16-chip
> modules. These parts are made up from 512Mb components.
> Dude, Crucial Employee, US Registered: 03-08-2010
>
> More importantly, either the listing for each stick should include
> this info, or at least somewhere prominent on the webpage it should
> say that "All Crucial 1GB unbuffered non-ECC DDR modules are going to
> be 16-chip modules, low-density." I should write them and tell them
> this. 
>
>> Paul
>
First off, high density isn't a very precise term, and it's a substitute
for saying "hey, you bought bad RAM". There is more than one situation
termed high density.
In this case, the high density and low density modules both use sixteen
chips. The low density module uses (16) 64Mx8, and the high density uses
(16) 128Mx4. A "rank" of memory, is enough memory chips to make a 64 bit
wide array. In the case of the high density UDIMM, all sixteen chips
are used to make one rank. So when that high density module is accessed,
all sixteen chips respond at the same time.
In the low density module case, there are two (8) 64Mx8 ranks. When
the low density UDIMM is accessed, either eight chips on one side
of the module, or eight chips on the other side of the module, respond.
So one half of the module "sleeps", for want of a better word. It means
there are two sets of control signals. One set of signals per side, with
eight loads on each signal.
So this information, is what I seek. The chip dimensions are
what is important. If you look at some Intel desktop chipset datasheets,
the preferred chip widths are x8 and x16, while x4 is not mentioned.
Most of the time, end users are using the x8 chips, to get the
highest possible module density. If you go with x4, that's not
even on Intel's radar.
"Parameter 1GB
Device configuration 512Mb (64 Meg x 8)"
That "x8" tells me I got the good stuff.
*******
Another one of the cases for RAM, would be something like
(16) 32Mx8 versus (8) 64Mx8. In that case, the issue is some
motherboards only detecting half of the memory array. Some
chipsets would lack enough address bits to access the entire
64M range. And the result, is only half the memory is detected.
In that case, a sticker with "-8" or "-16", would be
enough info to tell the difference. Both modules use 8 chip
ranks. The preferred module in that case, is the 16 chip one,
because the chips "aren't as deep" and only span 32M.
So you can see in the notation "(16) 32Mx8", there are three
numbers they can play with. One kind of high density, affects
different numbers, than the other kind of high density case.
And one can be detected by chip count, while the other, you
may want to get an actual chip part number, to verify the
device width.
Paul