On Sunday 28 Nov 2004 00:45, MarkW wrote:
> I appreciate all the advice I have received. One thing I've been
> concerned with is that there is potential the SATA drives could be
> slower than the ATA/133 drives I have now. I don't know the model
> number offhand except that they are maxtor drives. Maybe compared to
> older ATA133 drives they wouldn't be slower.
> The motherboards I have are both ASUS motherboards. One is the P4P800
> Deluxe, the other is the A7N8X-E. I am looking at the specs. and
> hoping it may give me some information so I can figure out how good
> the SATA controller is on them. It does list the P4P800 Deluxe board
> as having a Southbridge controller which I think is for both the SATA
> and the ATA133. Actually it also says it supports RAID 0,1. It has a
> VIA6410 RAID controller. For the A7N8X-E it doesn't say it's a
> southbridge controller. it says it supports RAID 0, RAID 1. It has a
> Silicon Image Sil 3112A RAID Controller.
I haven't read a lot of performance reviews lately but when I looked into it
about 18 months ago, it seemed that a step up in buffer size on the HD made
about the same difference as a step up in bus speed. I ended up going for
the A7N8X-D (which handles up to 4 ATA133, plus 2 SATA150) and a Seagate
SATA150 ('cos they're very quiet) but I haven't done any performance-heavy
stuff, really.
> [...]
> Also, I likely would stay away from SCSI but am curious about RAID. I
> probably have the wrong idea about it but from what I thought of RAID
> it's simply two drives working together that if one fails it's hot
> swappable and you can easily replace one and it'll replicate from the
> other drive. Basically that it's two mirrored drives acting as backup
> to each other.
> From what I read though is it something that makes a drive act faster?
A good summary is at <http://www.recoverdata.com/raidfaq.htm> (which I found
by googling for "raid faq"). Basically, RAID 0 makes your drives faster,
because it can write data to either drive, but if either drive fails, you
lose everything -- so it isn't really RAID. RAID 1 doesn't make your drive
faster, but if either one fails, you can replace it and all your data
should be fine. (In a desktop PC it's unlikely to be hot-swappable,
though, i.e., you'll have to turn the power off before you replace the
broken drive.)
RAID 5 combines the best of both, but needs at least 3 drives. If you want
RAID 5, you'll have to buy a separate RADI controller card (try
www.promise.com,
www.highpoint-tech.com,
www.3ware.com -- and google, of
course :-)
> Do you need to buy a specific drive that supports RAID?
No, but it makes sense to buy drives which are the same size (for RAID 1 and
above) because you'll only be able to use as much space on each drive as
the size of the smallest drive. I would probably buy several drives all
the same model.
> From what I see this motherboard supports it. The boards both say
> they support RAID 0,1 for SATA. Is this a technology that will make
> my hard drives faster?
RAID 0 = faster but unsafe; RAID 1 = safer but not faster.
Hope that helps,
Hugh.
--
Remove ".NO" and "SPAM." to reply.