tanstafl wrote:
> xpost to ATI, Nvidia & pc-homebuilt for coverage
>
> I'm starting to build a new system and I want to equip it with 22"
> dual monitors in landscape/portrait 1680x1050 & 1050x1680. 2 Samsung
> 2243BWX monitors. Mobo is a GA-X48-DQ6 with a PCIe 2.0 x16 slot. I'm
> not a gamer (other than an occasional rousing round of Minesweeper:-)
>
> I'm hoping to identify a minimalist dual DVI (VGA w/dongle may be OK)
> card that can use passive cooling (preserve use of the adjacent PCIe
> x1 slot). I only need 16 bit color so maybe that will allow less RAM
> (less heat). I don't need HDMI or HDCP. Ability to read the DCC to
> adapt to a change in the monitor pivot position is a plus.
>
> Operational stability & thermal survivability is paramount - cost
> isn't an issue. If ample operational envelope can't be gotten with
> passive cooling, then a move upscale to a fan based card that can be
> stable is something I'll have to accept - even if loss of the PCIe
> slot is the price. Build it & forget it. My main W2K system has been
> driving a 21" CRT with a Radeon 70 LE AGP passive card for 8 years now
> and still trucking. I'd like to see Dec 2016 come and go the same
> with the new XPproSP3 platform.
>
> Note: don't assume I know precisely what I'm asking for - that would
> be a mistake. I've done a bit of reading and 'I think' the above is
> sensible - but if not, don't hesitate to enlighten me,
> ignorance ain't bliss.
> ----
> Pete Gebel pfgebel(deletethis)@crisperiodcom
> Have the best day possible - all things considered
Your monitor has VGA and DVI connectors. That means, in a pinch,
you could use a card with one VGA and one DVI connector on it.
And that means a very cheap card could be used (your first card
will be a learning experience, where you learn that cheap is
not the same thing as good).
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...54&Tpk=2243BWX
On DVI interfaces, 1680x1050 is covered by a "single link" connector.
See the Specifications section here, where there are some examples of
resolution options.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Visual_Interface
You can skim through the lists here, to find a gutless card.
And gutless should have low power consumption. Something with
a 64 bit memory interface on the GPU for example. HD 3450
or 8400 GS perhaps.
http://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/
http://www.gpureview.com
Next, you can use the Newegg Advanced Search. Set interface to
PCI Express 2.0 if you want. Set "Cooler" near the bottom of
the list, to "fanless". It claims there are 143 cards (some
of which could be PCI Express 1.0 version cards).
http://www.newegg.com/Store/SubCateg...cs-Video-Cards
When I started reviewing the cards, virtually all of them had
issues of one sort or another. On one card, a guy said that
running two monitors in dual mode, the "whites" were blown
out on one display. That means something was wrong with
the contrast/brightness/gamma or some other setting, which
made the two displays differ.
So while there are cheap cards, and ones where the operating
temperature isn't in the danger zone, there are still the
odd issues.
As a result of looking at the reviewer comments for the
cards, I can't recommend anything :-( It is very much
a matter of tradeoffs, and deciding which is the least
annoying option.
Passively cooled cards, can have the cooler on the front
or on the back of the card. If on the front side,
the card will take up two slots (and possibly a third
if you want to leave an air channel for cooling). If
the passive cooler is on the backside, the cooler can
bump into the Northbridge heatsink - it all depends on
how massive the cooling structures are on the motherboard.
The benefit of a backside cooler, is the "air spill" from
the CPU fan, can help cool the card. But "air spill" only works
well, if the cooler is shaped to spill in the video card's
direction. Some expensive aftermarket coolers blow towards
the exhaust on the back of the case, and there isn't as much
air spill to work with.
Paul