For running non-overclocked, flip a coin, v2.0 versions of these two boards
are excellent choices and they both have similar features.
For overclocking, get the NF7-S v2.0, it has higher vcore, vdimm, vdd, vagp
options, and more space around the socket for wider range of CPU cooling
options. The A7N8X-Deluxe v2.0 will probably be able to keep up with the
ABIT, but it'll need at least a vcore mod for high CPU OC's and a vdd mod
for high FSB OCs.
I have a couple 8RDA+'s (vdd modded), a A7N8X-Deluxe (w/vcore and vdd mods),
and a couple NF7-S's. The two stock NF7-Ss overclock the best out of the
bunch (225 & 227 FSB sync dual channel out-of-box, 3DMark and Prime95
stable).
hth,
Scott
"Dave Hau" <davehau-no-spam-> wrote in message
news:Z5tJa.1206$ gy.com...
> Sorry if this has been asked numerous times before, but I'm looking for an
> updated answer...
>
> I'm pondering over the same deep eternal question of mankind:
>
> A7N8X or NF7-S?
>
> Their prices differ by only 8 bucks at newegg, hence the difficult
decision.
> (a7n8x = $130; nf7-s = $123).
>
> One thing I do like about the nf7-s is access to the whole 5-bit range of
> multipliers. For the a7n8x, you get either the high or low range of
> multipliers, and have to cut bridges to get the other range.
>
> So, I'm leaning towards the nf7-s. But let me cut to the chase:
>
> Is there any reason at all anyone would want to get the a7n8x over the
> nf7-s? (any reason other than onboard video, I'm not interested in IGP, I
> have my own agp8x video card.)
>
> Also, which board has less stability problem overall (e.g. IRQ conflict)?
I
> want to play around with overclocking initially, but eventually I want to
> settle down and use this board to run a stable system for the next few
years
> hopefully.
>
> Thanks!
>
> - Dave
>
>
|