foobar wrote:
>
> The PS is the one that it's had since I built everything back in '99
> so it's 4 years old.
Power-transistors don't last forever.
Neither do caps, but they could last a few more years.
Have a look inside the PSU to check the caps and while you're at it,
clean out the dust - dust buildup could make some of it run so hot, that
voltages would be somewhat off.
Another thing - I also have an Abit ZM6 (somewhere) and I remember
putting thermal paste below the heatsink on the Northbridge.
There was none when I originally removed it to check.
A heat problem with the Northbridge could also cause "memory" errors,
although the memory sticks would be fine.
> It's like a 235W or 250W or something.
If you buy a new one, I would recommend an Antec.
I currently have an Antec PP-303XF powering a system with a T-Bred
running at 2000 MHz on an Abit NF7. Very low noise.
Extremely stable.
> The
> voltages displayed in BIOS are probably within less than a 0.5V or
> spec
They should be within ±0.2V of spec for +3.3V and +5V, (and within ±0.5V
for +12V - the +12V rail is not very sensitive to voltage out of spec
though).
Particularly, the voltages shouldn't be too low.
A system might still run seemingly "stable" with voltages out of that
range, but it would be very sensitive to voltage drops/hops - and would
either reset, lock up or exhibit strange errors occasionally.
> - I can check and post exact voltages - not sure if that tells us
> anything. What should I be looking for on PS issues?
Well, practically what you are experiencing right now - a not 100%
stable system.
Voltage out of spec indicates a defective PSU (Power Supply Unit).
> It's been so long since I have checked the voltages - I'd have to boot
> and double check
You can check the voltages with Winbond Hardware Doctor, downloadable
from Abit.
ftp://ftp.abit.com.tw/pub/download/fae/zm6.exe
Check voltages when running at full load - use cpuburn to do that;
http://users.ev1.net/~redelm/
> but I want to see it's voltage is pretty close to
> 'stock', maybe 1.8 or 1.85V?
Stock voltage(Vcore) for a Celeron 366 is 2.0V, but running at 550 it
would have to be overvolted to 2.2V (at least).
Below 2.2V it will probably not be stable, especially since it is now 4
years old.
Has it been running 24/7, or just some hours every day?
A Vcore that is low, compared to the Bios setting, indicates defect caps
or PSU.
> I've not noticed any obvious visual problems w/ the caps but I wasn't
> looking for anything either - I just had it opened up and on the table
> and blew out some dust when I went thru things before installing W2K.
> It's back in it's 'corner' but I'll double check w/ a flashlight for
> any signs as suggested.
Good, it could still be the caps.
> I do have memtest86 and have run it in the past including recently
> (since this problem manifested) and it has always been fine. HOWEVER
> just the other day I ran it again and did got some errors right around
> the 1mb and 127-129mb area - maybe 2000 errors specifically in TEST 5
> [Block Move, 64 Moves, cached].
And no errors in test 5, non-cached?
I didn't go any deeper into it, because I would wait and see whether
memtest86 reported errors.
> That's strange because I hadn't seen
> that before. I pulled sticks and re tested 1 stick at a time - got the
> same error in similar locations but the # of errors dropped
> considerably to only 10 or 20 errors.
Same (test 5, cached) error with both sticks, one at a time?
No errors in test 5, non-cached?
(Let's call them stick A and B)
> I've since adjusted some of the
> CMOS settings
Which settings?
> and need to retest and verify if the problem was due to
> a setting I had previously fiddled w/ or not. Strange.
>
> I'm a bit confused about memtest86 - I've got some older systems too
> and sometimes memtest has reported EDO memory errors on those and yet
> they are rock steady just fine...?
Have you also tried running the Prime95 "torture test" on those systems?
> Is this generally considered a
> pretty reliable tool?
Yes.
If memtest86 reports errors, it's because there is something wrong.
(no false-positives)
Memtest86 stresses the memory in a way that rarely occurs in everyday
use, so it will even find errors that might only occur once or twice a year.
> Any good sites/recommendations that explain all the intricacies and
> such on some of these BIOS settings...?
Tomshardware's BIOS Guide maybe..?
> Prime95!? Hadn't run that since I built this system. I'll give that a
> shot as well as retest w/ memtest86.
Well, now that we know memtest86 reports errors, we don't need it.
It is usually run to check CPU+Chipset+RAM stability.
If Prime95 and memtest86 had reported no errors, I'd have said it was a
software problem.