BillJohnston wrote:
> Bought another non-working motherboard to troubleshoot the original.
> Found I fried an octal tri-state buffer driver and have one on order.
> Got the other board working but now I'm confused and wonder if the CPU
> is damaged. It's a 3.06 Pentium 4M that's running at 1.594GHZ. I saw
> this on the first board and in retrospect thought it was because it was
> running on the battery. Now it's running on AC and still running at 1.5
> GHz. The BIOS has been updated to A32. When I got to WinXP System
> Properties it says it has a 3.06GHz processor running at 1.59GHz.
> So, I reboot into Debian Linux Lenny. I run Folding@Home. On an
> EVO N610c running FAH, with a 2GHz processor, 1% of a mini chaperonin WU
> takes 1 hr 41 minutes 14 seconds with a core priority of 95%. On an EVO
> N600c running a 1.06GHz processor, 1% of a mini chaperonin takes 2 hours
> 23 minutes 41 seconds. On this Insprion 5100 with a 3.06GHz processor
> (dmesg says it's a 1594.735MHz processor), I started a mini chaperonin
> at 02:04:30 UTC and it's presently 05:18:53 UTC and it still is working
> on its first 1% (core priority 96%). What gives?
>
> Bill Johnston
> 
>
>
Question: With the 3.06GHz P4M running at 1.6GHz, does the motherboard
charge the battery? If not, then the motherboard has a snarled up
charging circuit. If so, could be the CPU.
If you have any Socket 478 2+GHz Celeron handy, install it instead, as
another check. The Latitude 100L (twin motherboard design separated at
birth) commonly shipped with a Celery chip... Ben Myers