"Patrick Vervoorn" <> wrote in
message news:b2786$4777ce44$82a1d3bf$ l...
> In article <RoIdj.1$>,
> Dima <dima-> wrote:
>>Here you go, download and run the BitBit 2D benchmark.
>>http://www.karpfenteich.net/colorful/bitblt.html
>>
>>couldn't resist, but hope it's accurate
>>HD 3870 results - 1680x1050, Vista x64
>>
>>BitBlt:
>>avg: 2461.0 fps [2884.0 MB/sec]
>>max: 3975.1 fps [4658.3 MB/sec]
>>min: 97.6 fps [114.4 MB/sec]
>>
>>ReverseBlt:
>>avg: 727.9 fps [853.0 MB/sec]
>>max: 4292.0 fps [5029.7 MB/sec]
>>min: 103.5 fps [121.3 MB/sec]
>
> On a Q6600/2.4GHz/8800GTX - 1680x1050, WinXP Pro 32bits:
>
> BitBlt:
> avg: 1336.6 fps [1566.3 MB/sec]
> max: 2519.0 fps [2952.0 MB/sec]
> min: 804.9 fps [943.3 MB/sec]
>
> ReverseBlt:
> avg: 1189.5 fps [1393.9 MB/sec]
> max: 1419.9 fps [1663.9 MB/sec]
> min: 498.5 fps [584.1 MB/sec]
>
> Weird numbers. Is this is in any way meaningful? 
>
> Regards, Patrick.
Following this thread with curiosity...
My numbers:
E6600 @ 3.2GHz; 2GB RAM; 8800GS; 1680 x 1050, Vista Ultimate 32 bit:
BitBlt:
avg: 3315.5 fps [3885.4 MB/sec]
max: 7275.9 fps [8526.4 MB/sec]
min: 106.0 fps [124.2 MB/sec]
ReverseBlt:
avg: 3970.8 fps [4653.3 MB/sec]
max: 6063.5 fps [7105.7 MB/sec]
min: 1831.0 fps [2145.7 MB/sec]
It runs so fast, it's just a blink on the screen.
(Oh, and this is with a ton of 'stuff' running)
Jack R