Motherboard Forums


Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Re: Fastest graphic card for Windows workstation use (2D, not gaming)

 
 





















Patrick Vervoorn
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-30-2007, 11:17 PM


In article <rbSdj.4089$ZI4.1654@trnddc08>,
Outback Jon <> wrote:
>Patrick Vervoorn wrote:
>> Weird numbers. Is this is in any way meaningful?
>>
>> Regards, Patrick.

>
>I would think that numbers that are so ridiculously high above what
>*any* monitor is capable of actually displaying on the screen really
>wouldn't mean much.
>
>Realistically, if your monitor can only show 120 fps (120 Hz) then
>having the capability to show 10x that on average, and 7x that at a
>minimum probably doesn't really do anything for you.


I don't think the benchmark was intended as that. It's also ridiculously
short; it finishes while I barely see the screen flashing.

My question was more a comment: I think that benchmark is ridiculously
outdated, and gives no meaningful indication whatsoever. I tried running
it a 2nd time, and I got totally different outcomes, indicating it's much
too short to really 'measure' anything.

[snip]

Regards, Patrick.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Jack R
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-31-2007, 01:59 AM

"Patrick Vervoorn" <> wrote in
message news:b2786$4777ce44$82a1d3bf$ l...
> In article <RoIdj.1$>,
> Dima <dima-> wrote:
>>Here you go, download and run the BitBit 2D benchmark.
>>http://www.karpfenteich.net/colorful/bitblt.html
>>
>>couldn't resist, but hope it's accurate
>>HD 3870 results - 1680x1050, Vista x64
>>
>>BitBlt:
>>avg: 2461.0 fps [2884.0 MB/sec]
>>max: 3975.1 fps [4658.3 MB/sec]
>>min: 97.6 fps [114.4 MB/sec]
>>
>>ReverseBlt:
>>avg: 727.9 fps [853.0 MB/sec]
>>max: 4292.0 fps [5029.7 MB/sec]
>>min: 103.5 fps [121.3 MB/sec]

>
> On a Q6600/2.4GHz/8800GTX - 1680x1050, WinXP Pro 32bits:
>
> BitBlt:
> avg: 1336.6 fps [1566.3 MB/sec]
> max: 2519.0 fps [2952.0 MB/sec]
> min: 804.9 fps [943.3 MB/sec]
>
> ReverseBlt:
> avg: 1189.5 fps [1393.9 MB/sec]
> max: 1419.9 fps [1663.9 MB/sec]
> min: 498.5 fps [584.1 MB/sec]
>
> Weird numbers. Is this is in any way meaningful?
>
> Regards, Patrick.


Following this thread with curiosity...
My numbers:
E6600 @ 3.2GHz; 2GB RAM; 8800GS; 1680 x 1050, Vista Ultimate 32 bit:
BitBlt:
avg: 3315.5 fps [3885.4 MB/sec]
max: 7275.9 fps [8526.4 MB/sec]
min: 106.0 fps [124.2 MB/sec]

ReverseBlt:
avg: 3970.8 fps [4653.3 MB/sec]
max: 6063.5 fps [7105.7 MB/sec]
min: 1831.0 fps [2145.7 MB/sec]

It runs so fast, it's just a blink on the screen.
(Oh, and this is with a ton of 'stuff' running)

Jack R


 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ASUS P5K-E and Graphics card problem JosephMo Asus 8 02-13-2008 05:13 PM
Monitor shuts down due to new graphic card!! yazir Gigabyte 0 05-12-2007 02:01 PM
Choosing a PCIe graphic card for my Dimension E520 / 5150 Preben Q Dell 7 01-30-2007 11:22 AM
! I Want to Build a Video Workstation. NOT GAMING AT ALL Whats best? Asus 1 12-30-2006 09:27 PM
! I Want to Build a Video Workstation. NOT GAMING AT ALL Whats best? Asus 2 12-29-2006 12:37 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:14 AM.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43