Re: Re: DirectX 9.1 and GeForce FX = 60% boost in Pixels Shaders 2.0?

Dude..its a joke..trust me thats not true..

If it were that would be awesome news but its so obvious that its a joke...

Also..I wouldnt be suprised if that missinformation was put out by ATI fans.

cheezemurda wrote:

> Dude..its a joke..trust me thats not true..
>
> If it were that would be awesome news but its so obvious that its a joke...
>
> Also..I wouldnt be suprised if that missinformation was put out by ATI fans.

Nvidia has always maintained that the FX has a problem with a complex
pipeline stalling out all the time and that DX9 isn't particularly
suited towards such a complex architecture (moreso an equal number of
texture reads and shader ops, in which case an 8x1 pipe like ATI's does
better).

They've also said many times that successive compiler revisions will
eventually eleviate many of the issues with dynamic optimization and
less stalls. A new HLSL compiler in DX9.1 as well as a general rewrite
to favor complex architectures overall and in conjunction with good
driver (as the 52.xx and above are proported to be) should bring about
great improvements.

We dont have to....We've got the REAL thing....ATI DID NOT PAID SHITLOADS OF
$$$$$$ TO VALVE so they can hold back the release day while NVIDIA writes
another half decent driver for ur dudes....


"cheezemurda" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Dude..its a joke..trust me thats not true..
>
> If it were that would be awesome news but its so obvious that its a
joke...
>
> Also..I wouldnt be suprised if that missinformation was put out by ATI
fans.

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 21:46:10 -0500, "cheezemurda"
<> wrote:

>Dude..its a joke..trust me thats not true..
>
>If it were that would be awesome news but its so obvious that its a joke...
>
>Also..I wouldnt be suprised if that missinformation was put out by ATI fans.

dx 9.1 is for the latess video card like rv400 nv40
and it will be called pixel and vertex shader 3 =60% boost