"Paul" <> wrote in message
news:gjm2aa$7gl$...
> CSquared wrote:
> > I found this discussion very interesting as I am wanting to be able
to
> > hot swap some drives myself. What is the symptom when one swaps a
drive
> > in or out that is not "hot swap capable"? Is the drive merely not
> > recognized, or can hardware damage occur?
> > Thanks,
> > --
> > Charlie C.
> > To email me, eradicate obfuscate & remove dot invalid
> >
>
> It sounds like Carl has done more experiments with this
> than I have.
>
> If the hot swap is not working, then you wouldn't expect
> the system to see the disk at all. The event from the
> hardware, would not be raised to the software (because
> either the path is missing inside the driver code, or
> the OS itself doesn't support drives appearing out of
> nowhere).
>
> The SATA connectors are designed with hot swap in mind,
> and even if the driver code was missing, there should be
> no damage to the drive. If you look at the SATA cable,
> certain pins are longer than the other pins. Those pins
> touch first, and prevent negative voltages appearing on
> the sensitive data pins.
Both of the above paragraphs are pretty much what I would have expected.
I really had not done my homework on this issue and probably should not
have posted regarding it at all yet, but I figured what the heck - it
was the first work day of the new year.

Also, it is a subject in
which I have more than passing interest.
>
> If you look at the instructions for one of those
> SATA to USB converters, they suggest a certain order
> if connecting cables to a cold drive. Connect the 15 pin
> SATA power wafer first. Then connect the data cable second.
> When you think about it, you should be connecting your
> cables, to minimize vibration to a running drive, so one
> end of the data cable can be fastened to the drive first,
> then the power cable gets connected, and then the other
> end of the data cable goes to the motherboard.
>
> When you're finished with the drive later, and you want
> the OS to keep running, first you use the "Safely remove"
> icon in the tray, to flush the cache on the drive. Then,
> you'd unplug the data cable from the motherboard connector.
> (That way, there is no mechanical shock to the still-powered
> drive.) Next, disconnect the power to the drive, preferably
> by disconnecting an adapter cable from the power supply - not
> by yanking on a connector right on the drive. So when you're
> finished, you have a drive in your hands, with a power and
> a data cable still in place, but the other ends have been
> disconnected in a particular order. Once the drive spins
> down (give it 30 seconds or more), it is more resistance
> to shock, so you can carefully remove the cables from the
> drive.
>
> It is sorta like car batteries, when you give you buddy's car
> a boost. There is a certain order to connect the cables
> there as well, for safety reasons.
That makes perfect sense to me. My current vision for using a removable
drive is primarily as a mostly-non-spinning alternate backup for .jpg
files I've saved from my camera. (I'm a firm believer in multiple -
like 3 or more - backups for irreplaceable things like digital pictures.
And yes, I have multiple CDs burned at intervals, but I'd still like to
have them on a different medium as well.) In that scenario, I would
probably just leave the power and data cables connected to the external
drive essentially all the time. I can just hear someone say "Yeah, but
what happens when you fill that drive up and need 2 or more drives?"
I'll grant everyone ahead of time that is a real possibility. I suppose
an extra set of cables for each external drive would not add all that
much more cost though.
I was actually thinking more in terms of the hot-swap trays one can
mount in a drive bay, since I always tend to over-build in the area of
the PC case and have lots of spare empty drive bays as a result. I did
today finally do a bit of homework and found quite a few of these at my
favorite internet vendor (Newegg - no affiliation, just a happy
customer) in the $25 to $35 US range. Several mention being
"master/slave free" which I'll admit I had not thought about.
In any case, thanks much for your comments.
Charlie C.
>
> HTH,
> Paul