Motherboard Forums


Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

SB Live 5.1 Digital vs Realtek 850

 
 





















BigSky
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-10-2007, 04:16 AM


Which gives better sound for gaming: SB Live 5.1 Digital or the onboard
Realtek 850? Seems like some games really don't like to use the SB Live
series especially if hardware rendering is enabled.

BigSky


 
Reply With Quote
 
Folk
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-10-2007, 06:12 PM
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:16:55 GMT, "BigSky" <>
wrote:

>Which gives better sound for gaming: SB Live 5.1 Digital or the onboard
>Realtek 850? Seems like some games really don't like to use the SB Live
>series especially if hardware rendering is enabled.
>
>BigSky
>


I was just reading a forum post on that topic. You might get some
mileage out of it:

http://techreport.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=46844
 
Reply With Quote
 
Shep©
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-20-2007, 02:36 AM
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:16:55 GMT I never confuse arrogance with
confidence nor ability with ambition "BigSky"
<> sent this :

>Which gives better sound for gaming: SB Live 5.1 Digital or the onboard
>Realtek 850? Seems like some games really don't like to use the SB Live
>series especially if hardware rendering is enabled.
>
>BigSky
>


I would normally say any PCI sound card is better than on board
however I was never impressed with the SB 5.1 live digital I bought
and used some years ago and in gaming it caused lag no matter what
drivers and hacks I used.

I went,"Retro" recently and got back 2 mega cheap SB PCI 128s off Ebay
recently as these were by far and away the best gaming sound card I've
ever had and the DACs for the prices are unbelievable.S/N ratios were
always good on these cards.Nothing fancy,no mega bundled software.Not
5.1/6.1 or other BS.

Didn't even have to download or use any drivers as even WinXP sussed
the card when I put it in(I was well surprised at that).

http://search.ebay.co.uk/search/sear...eative+pci+128

even in PCs/Computers there are,"Classics" and these cards are one.For
the cost,as you can see,try one.Blows all the others
out-of-the-water.All other software/programs can be found online to do
what you want with them anyway if you know where to look

It's the chips I tell you,it's the chips<BFG>



--
Free Windows/PC help,
http://www.geocities.com/sheppola/trouble.html
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page...m?bandID=88558
 
Reply With Quote
 
Shep©
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-20-2007, 02:37 AM
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:12:01 -0500 I never confuse arrogance with
confidence nor ability with ambition Folk <> sent this :

>On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:16:55 GMT, "BigSky" <>
>wrote:
>
>>Which gives better sound for gaming: SB Live 5.1 Digital or the onboard
>>Realtek 850? Seems like some games really don't like to use the SB Live
>>series especially if hardware rendering is enabled.
>>
>>BigSky
>>

>
>I was just reading a forum post on that topic. You might get some
>mileage out of it:
>
>http://techreport.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=46844


Long time no see Folk



--
Free Windows/PC help,
http://www.geocities.com/sheppola/trouble.html
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page...m?bandID=88558
 
Reply With Quote
 
Folk
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-21-2007, 11:52 PM
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 02:37:28 +0000, Shep© <> wrote:

>On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:12:01 -0500 I never confuse arrogance with
>confidence nor ability with ambition Folk <> sent this :
>
>>On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:16:55 GMT, "BigSky" <>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Which gives better sound for gaming: SB Live 5.1 Digital or the onboard
>>>Realtek 850? Seems like some games really don't like to use the SB Live
>>>series especially if hardware rendering is enabled.
>>>
>>>BigSky
>>>

>>
>>I was just reading a forum post on that topic. You might get some
>>mileage out of it:
>>
>>http://techreport.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=46844

>
>Long time no see Folk


That's a fact. We go *way* back to the super socket7 days.

Of course you probably still have yours...
 
Reply With Quote
 
Shep©
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-23-2007, 11:15 AM
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 18:52:53 -0500 I never confuse arrogance with
confidence nor ability with ambition Folk <> sent this :

>On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 02:37:28 +0000, Shep© <> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:12:01 -0500 I never confuse arrogance with
>>confidence nor ability with ambition Folk <> sent this :
>>
>>>On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:16:55 GMT, "BigSky" <>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>Which gives better sound for gaming: SB Live 5.1 Digital or the onboard
>>>>Realtek 850? Seems like some games really don't like to use the SB Live
>>>>series especially if hardware rendering is enabled.
>>>>
>>>>BigSky
>>>>
>>>
>>>I was just reading a forum post on that topic. You might get some
>>>mileage out of it:
>>>
>>>http://techreport.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=46844

>>
>>Long time no see Folk

>
>That's a fact. We go *way* back to the super socket7 days.
>
>Of course you probably still have yours...


Heh.Heh.Still using an Atari



--
Free Windows/PC help,
http://www.geocities.com/sheppola/trouble.html
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page...m?bandID=88558
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sound Blaster Live! 5.1 Digital (Dell) E Asus 0 03-19-2008 05:44 AM
Realtek NIC Will Not Wake On LAN (WOL) azzkadazz Shuttle 0 01-04-2008 04:18 PM
How do I get the digital audio input to use the STB digital audio signal? Lew HP 0 05-19-2007 04:26 AM
OT: New LCD Monitor Not That Crisp? (PeteCresswell) Asus 16 03-14-2007 01:45 PM
S-Video & Digital Audio from Dell? archean1@gmail.com Dell 1 12-12-2006 04:00 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:04 AM.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43