'Daniel Albuschat' wrote, in part:
| I appreciate your great help and the effort you're putting into this
| newsgroup. Thanks for that!
| But still, you seem to have some issues in quoting efficiently and in a
| readable manner. :-)
| You often seem to double-quote the original poster, which is quite
| confusing. You should always include the parts you're refering to (and
| all other parts that are needed for a shallow understanding of the
| topic) and reply BELOW those quotes.
_____
Thank you for your suggestion. However, that is exactly what I do.
First: the name of the poster to whom I reply.
Second: relevant quote sufficient to identify the questions; preceded by
'wrote' if the quote contains more or less the full post
OR
'wrote, in part' if only part of the original post is
quoted.
Third: _____
Fourth: my reply.
Fifth: my signature.
Sixth: the full post to which I reply, including message id (sometimes with
the chain of earlier posts deleted if excessively long); I include this last
to specifically id the message and as a backup incase I should have
miss-quoted or taken out of context. Though I agree this last step is, in a
way, 'double quoting', I believe it serves a purpose; improving both
readability and creditability.
What could be more clear, efficient, or less confusing?
Phil Weldon
"Daniel Albuschat" <> wrote in message
news:fmptkc$gpu$00$...
| Hello Phil!
|
| I appreciate your great help and the effort you're putting into this
| newsgroup. Thanks for that!
| But still, you seem to have some issues in quoting efficiently and in a
| readable manner. :-)
| You often seem to double-quote the original poster, which is quite
| confusing. You should always include the parts you're refering to (and
| all other parts that are needed for a shallow understanding of the
| topic) and reply BELOW those quotes.
|
| It should look like this:
|
| Haris wrote:
| > [Haris' text]
|
| [Phil's text]
|
| This is the least confusing, most clearly arranged and most accepted way
| of quoting that even has built-in support in most news-readers.
|
| You can also find a more detailed explanation here:
|
http://learn.to/quote
|
| Again, please bear in mind that I'm just trying to help (you and the
| people reading your posts) and not criticize you, since I appreciate the
| uncountable helpful replies you made in this group.
|
| Regards,
|
| Daniel Albuschat