![]() |
|
|||||||

![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Uncle Vinnie wrote:
> Thanks Dave... the odd thing is that I have the problems when I have 2 of > the 133's! If I have a 256-133 in the first slot and a 128-100 in the 2nd, > all works fine! I don't like to mix but this configuration is working... I > was thinking of asking the company to replace the 133's with 100 > altogether.... I just may do that since the RMA is still open... Odd it's > happening... Could still be the same thing as PC133 comes in different timings too; like if one is CAS2 and the other CAS3. > > "David Maynard" <> wrote in message > news:... > >>Uncle Vinnie wrote: >> >>>Chips being used are low density- XP crashes - BSOD- messages are all >> > memory > >>>related- and confirmed to be memory related when I called MS tech >> > support. > >>>Each stick - one at a time, test clean using memtest386. It is when >> > 2x256's > >>>are installed, mem works fine for a few days, then the system starts >>>crashing constantly. I go back, keep either just the 128-100 and/or 1 >>>256-133, it's fine... any ideas? I thought this might be a good place >> > to > >>>post since at one point, the MS rep asked me if I knew what overclocking >>>was.. afer reading him the code... could the mobo be having a hard time >>>keeping the 133's at 100? In addition/or due to the Upgradeware socket >> > as > >>>well??? >> >>What might be happening is the BIOS auto setting memory paramters based >>on the PC133 with that being too much for the PC100. Try reversing which >>socket they're in with the hope it'll pick the PC100 settings. >> >> >> >> >>>"David Maynard" <> wrote in message >>>news:... >>> >>> >>>>Uncle Vinnie wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>RE: 133 speed ram/ Compaq 5000/ WinXP: >>>>> >>>>>I'm at the conclusion that my PC isn't good at running 133's at >>>> >>>100...even >>> >>> >>>>>though the 133's are to Compaq spec and my Presario is 100 only- and is >>>>>supposedly able to slow 'em down... for now I have a 256/133 in the >>>> >>>first >>> >>> >>>>>slot, a 128/100 in the 2nd... as opposed to 256/133's in each to get to >>>>>512... I have access to a 256/100... should I put the 256/100 in the >>>> >>>first >>> >>> >>>>>slot and the 256/133 in the second? thank you! >>>>> >>>>>Some more details are the board is supposed to be a Mitac 6513WU, has >>>> >>>133 >>> >>> >>>>>FSB, Intel 810e chipset- also added, 12. Tually with Upgradeware >>>>>copper/tually adapter... >>>>> >>>>>I am guessing something is causing the memory to race a bit?? Am I >>>> >>>making >>> >>> >>>>>any sense? >>>>>- >>>>>- >>>>>B'rgds. >>>>>Vinnie >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>I would help if you described what the apparent 'problem' is. It doesn't >>>>post? Only 128 meg of the 256 meg stick shows up? Total memory shown is >>>>what? Boots but locks up when <insert what>? >>>> >>>>Did you get a low or high density 256 Meg stick? 810E chipset needs low >>>>density. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > |