Motherboard Point

Go Back   Motherboard Point > Motherboards > Supermicro
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Supermicro on the cheap

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-24-2003, 10:24 PM
 
@ac e ds l.com


I have a multi-threaded application that I am running on a P4 2.8ghz HT
where I am just about out of CPU resources. Anyone have any particular
recommendations for a dual XEON Supermicro motherboard, including
vendors that are not price gouging for these boards?

The config I am looking for is 2.6 ghz Dual Xeon, 2GB non-ECC (cheaper
than ECC). If I can I would rather not spend hundreds of dollars on a
Supermicro case if possible and just buy a $50 INWIN special and equip
it with a few fans. Anyone else able to get away with a low end case
without having heat dissipation problems with these dual Xeon boards?



Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-25-2003, 01:05 AM
 
@ac e ds l.com
Default Re: Supermicro on the cheap


Citizen Ed wrote:
> What application are you running. I can make a better recommendation
> with that information.


The application, Mnogosearch is a web based search engine software for
Linux. My configuration uses Mysql 4.0, a cache Word index which is
divided into 8192 files and a compressed storage document database
(several hundred thousand files, 1gb in size). I compile it with gcc on
my Linux 2.4.20 kernel.

My performance bottlenecks are with mysql and cache database index
updates eat all my CPU resources. I also lose a little bit of time in
disk search as it searches the cache database files. Therefore I am
thinking 60gb SCSI likely would be better than the current ATA-100 IDE
controller. I am trying to do this as cheap as possible therefore
single drive and no raid.

No AGP needed, and a simple old 8mb video would suffice.

> Do you need AGP? SCSI? You can't run a dual Xeon Supermicro board
> without ECC Registered memory. They require it for a reason. If you're
> running multi-CPU systems with non-ECC memory there is significant
> potential for conflict and error.


This is good to know.

Thx Ed.

> There isn't really a heat problem with low end cases, but if you're
> looking at a $50 case, I hope you're looking at a $100 power supply to
> stick in it. I rarely recommend anything but Antec for dual CPU
> workstations, and never anything less than their True 430 watt. The CAN
> generate some heat, but if you just fill all the available fan spots in
> your case, it should stay sufficiently cool.
>
> Let me know on the application thing and on the AGP thing, and I can
> recommend a board for you.
>
> Ed
>
> @ac wrote:
>
>> I have a multi-threaded application that I am running on a P4 2.8ghz
>> HT where I am just about out of CPU resources. Anyone have any
>> particular recommendations for a dual XEON Supermicro motherboard,
>> including vendors that are not price gouging for these boards?
>>
>> The config I am looking for is 2.6 ghz Dual Xeon, 2GB non-ECC (cheaper
>> than ECC). If I can I would rather not spend hundreds of dollars on a
>> Supermicro case if possible and just buy a $50 INWIN special and equip
>> it with a few fans. Anyone else able to get away with a low end case
>> without having heat dissipation problems with these dual Xeon boards?
>>
>>
>>

>


Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-25-2003, 10:39 PM
 
@ac e ds l.com
Default Re: Supermicro on the cheap

Thanks for the info. It looks like Supermicro is going to be out of my
price range even though it seems to be the way to go for a server mb. I
may even take a look at AMD multi processors at this point to open up a
whole new can of worms.

I found Asus to have a new dual XEON PC-DL for $212 but advertises it
for the power user. A dual XEON is a dual XEON so not sure if that makes
much of difference that I am using it as an application server.

If anyone has any recommendations....?

Citizen Ed wrote:
> Thanks for the information. Based on that, I would probably go with the
> Supermicro X5DE8.
> (http://www.mbx.com/specs/spec_adv.cfm?ProductID=16440) That board
> includes a video controller, dual Gigabit Ethernet, and a U320 SCSI
> controller. You can use any Xeon processor with a 533 FSB, and up to 4
> GB of memory.
> As an alternative, since you have a stated preference for something
> inexpensive, you might want to take a look at this:
> Use the X5DEi-GG,
> (http://www.mbx.com/specs/spec_adv.cfm?ProductID=17332) which is the
> same board, just minus the SCSI controller. Then, add a Promise Serial
> ATA RAID controller
> (http://www.mbx.com/specs/spec_adv.cfm?ProductID=18549) and a couple
> Western Digital 36GB 10,000 RPM Serial ATA drives
> (http://www.mbx.com/specs/spec_adv.cfm?ProductID=17846) in a striped
> RAID array. You can get better performance out of a RAID array than out
> of a single SCSI drive, and the overall cost will be lower.
> Let me know what you think.
>
> Ed
>
> @ac wrote:
>
>>
>> Citizen Ed wrote:
>>
>>> What application are you running. I can make a better recommendation
>>> with that information.

>>
>>
>>
>> The application, Mnogosearch is a web based search engine software for
>> Linux. My configuration uses Mysql 4.0, a cache Word index which is
>> divided into 8192 files and a compressed storage document database
>> (several hundred thousand files, 1gb in size). I compile it with gcc
>> on my Linux 2.4.20 kernel.
>>
>> My performance bottlenecks are with mysql and cache database index
>> updates eat all my CPU resources. I also lose a little bit of time in
>> disk search as it searches the cache database files. Therefore I am
>> thinking 60gb SCSI likely would be better than the current ATA-100 IDE
>> controller. I am trying to do this as cheap as possible therefore
>> single drive and no raid.
>>
>> No AGP needed, and a simple old 8mb video would suffice.
>>
>>> Do you need AGP? SCSI? You can't run a dual Xeon Supermicro board
>>> without ECC Registered memory. They require it for a reason. If
>>> you're running multi-CPU systems with non-ECC memory there is
>>> significant potential for conflict and error.

>>
>>
>>
>> This is good to know.
>>
>> Thx Ed.
>>
>>> There isn't really a heat problem with low end cases, but if you're
>>> looking at a $50 case, I hope you're looking at a $100 power supply
>>> to stick in it. I rarely recommend anything but Antec for dual CPU
>>> workstations, and never anything less than their True 430 watt. The
>>> CAN generate some heat, but if you just fill all the available fan
>>> spots in your case, it should stay sufficiently cool.
>>>
>>> Let me know on the application thing and on the AGP thing, and I can
>>> recommend a board for you.
>>>
>>> Ed
>>>
>>> @ac wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have a multi-threaded application that I am running on a P4 2.8ghz
>>>> HT where I am just about out of CPU resources. Anyone have any
>>>> particular recommendations for a dual XEON Supermicro motherboard,
>>>> including vendors that are not price gouging for these boards?
>>>>
>>>> The config I am looking for is 2.6 ghz Dual Xeon, 2GB non-ECC
>>>> (cheaper than ECC). If I can I would rather not spend hundreds of
>>>> dollars on a Supermicro case if possible and just buy a $50 INWIN
>>>> special and equip it with a few fans. Anyone else able to get away
>>>> with a low end case without having heat dissipation problems with
>>>> these dual Xeon boards?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>

>>

>


Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.