Thunderbird vs. Athlon XP processors...

I have an older A7V133 with an Athlon Thunderbird 1GHz processor. What is
the difference between this older processor and the newer Athlon XP
processors? (other than speed, of course) Do the XP processors run cooler?
Just curious....

Tom

On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 17:32:30 GMT, "Tom" <> wrote:

>I have an older A7V133 with an Athlon Thunderbird 1GHz processor. What is
>the difference between this older processor and the newer Athlon XP
>processors? (other than speed, of course) Do the XP processors run cooler?
>Just curious....
>
>Tom
>

Full support for Intel's SSE instructions (Opteron supports SSE2)
An improved hardware data prefetch mechanism
Enhancements to the Athlon's Translation Look-aside Buffers
Smaller die size (.13 vs .18) = Lower power consumption
On-die thermal diode

Bartons may run even a tad cooler due to more core surface area
contacting the heatsink.

Ed
AMD info Links,
http://tinyurl.com/cu77

Ed schrieb:
>
]Athlon TBird vs. XP]
> Smaller die size (.13 vs .18) = Lower power consumption

Yes and no. The original Athlon XPs with the Palomino core were still
0.18µ parts, but did run cooler than the TBirds do to various other
improvements. The move to 0.13µ with the Thoroughbred allowed using
lower core voltages, wheich in turn reduced the power consumption for
clock cycle again. Without lower core voltages, you'd only get higher
leakage currents (which are generally relatively low with Athlons as
opposed to 0.13µ Pentium IIIs and 4s, but have increased with the die
shrink).

Stephan
--
Home: http://stephan.win31.de/ | Webm.: http://www.i24.com/
PC#6: i440LX, 2xCel300A, 256 MB, 18 GB, ATI AGP 32 MB, 110W
This is a SCSI-inside, Legacy-plus, TCPA-free computer
Reply to newsgroup only. | S: Kleinen Coppermine Slot 1 (günstig)

On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 20:05:01 +0200, Stephan Grossklass
<> wrote:

>Ed schrieb:
>>
>]Athlon TBird vs. XP]
>> Smaller die size (.13 vs .18) = Lower power consumption
>
>Yes and no. The original Athlon XPs with the Palomino core were still
>0.18µ parts, but did run cooler than the TBirds do to various other
>improvements. The move to 0.13µ with the Thoroughbred allowed using
>lower core voltages, wheich in turn reduced the power consumption for
>clock cycle again. Without lower core voltages, you'd only get higher
>leakage currents (which are generally relatively low with Athlons as
>opposed to 0.13µ Pentium IIIs and 4s, but have increased with the die
>shrink).
>
>Stephan

Yep your right, I forgot the Palomino was still a .18, things sure move
slow in the tech world! ;p

Ed