Ian D wrote:
> "RobV" <> wrote in message
> news:g9uitq$pp9$...
>> Peter van der Goes wrote:
>>> I'm currently using an Asus P5B Plus with an older Conroe running at
>>> 2.13 GHz. 4 Gig DDR2-800 memory.
>>> The P5B uses the Intel P965 chipset and claims to support
>>> 1066/800/533 system bus speeds.
>>> I now see all sorts of Core 2 Duo and Quad offerings, but I'm pretty
>>> sure my older motherboard poses some limitations.
>>>
>>> Which of the newer CPU's will work in the P5B and which are to be
>>> avoided?
>>
>> With the proper BIOS version, it can support nearly all, if not all
>> of them:
>>
>> http://support.asus.com/cpusupport/c...model=P5B-Plus
>>
>> Note the BIOS version required to the right.
>> BIOS updates:
>>
>> http://support.asus.com/download/dow...model=P5B-Plus
>>
>> For some reason all versions of the BIOS that support newer CPUs are
>> betas, but I have 1002 beta on my P5B Plus, which installed without
>> incident and runs the system just fine.
>>
>> I have a E6600 running with a 1333 MHz FSB at 3 GHz since I built the
>> computer more than a year ago. If I decide to upgrade the CPU, I'll
>> have no problems with updating the BIOS so it will be supported.
>>
> I have the P5B Dlx WiFi and am thinking of upgrading to the latest
> BIOS, 1236. I updated to 910 after I got the board, but that was
> before I installed XP Pro. Did Windows start up after the update as
> though
> nothing had happened, (no re-activation)? Also, did you have to
> reinstall any drivers? My CPU is also an E6600.
No, there would be no reason for Windows to require reactivation when
upgrading to another version of the BIOS, nor would you have to install
any drivers, since all you're doing is updating the BIOS so the BIOS
itself can recognize the newer CPUs, if you should install one of them.
If you do upgrade to another CPU, I still don't think there would be a
need for reactivation, but you never know with MS. ;-) It depends on
what they think a CPU upgrade means.