On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:58:36 -0500, "BillW50" <> wrote:
>
>"RnR" <> wrote in message
>news:.. .
>> On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:27:25 +1100, "Brian K"
>> <bjk444_remove_@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>I don't bother hiding the SSID as it gives you no extra security.
>>>No-one is
>>>going to get past your WPA2 even if they sit outside your house for a
>>>few
>>>years.
>>
>> In theory NOT true but speaking in a practical sense, I agree.
>> Unless one is paranoid, he's safe with WPA2 but there is free software
>> to try to decrypt it. The problem is it takes a lot of cpu or time to
>> do so and no one is going to bother unless they think it's worth the
>> effort and have the money to buy multiple pc's to work on the
>> decryption.
>
>I don't know if you have heard this before, but there was a hackers
>convention years ago in Las Vegas (or was it in Phoenix?), that hackers
>logged in on a stock WiFi for a new record of being 52 miles (50
>something anyway) away. Later I heard newer records being hundreds of
>miles away. Now where are these guys when I setup my WiFi? As I have a
>hard time pulling in mine just 600 feet away. lol
No Bill, hadn't heard of that but I have seen and heard of antennas
that supposedly can pull in the signal from a couple of miles. 52
miles does sound incredible .... hope they wire up Houston so everyone
can get free wifi all around the city instead of the bozo's that were
hired and never delivered.
|