a7v8x or a7n8x?

Discussion in 'Asus' started by elnimbus, Jun 24, 2003.

  1. elnimbus

    elnimbus Guest

    hello from france
    in your opinion: via kt 400 or nforce2-st ?
    regards


    olpa
     
    elnimbus, Jun 24, 2003
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. elnimbus

    Clive Lumb Guest

    Les deux sont bons, mais la NForce2 permet l'overclock facile et la mémoire
    double canal à 200 MHz.
    Both are good, but the NForce2 allows easy overclocking and dual channel
    memory at 200MHz.

    Clive
    (Aussi en France, but not French)

    Ce n'est pas une très bonne idée de laisser trainer vos adresses e-mail en
    clair dans votre signature, et encore moins dans l'en-tête de vos message
    sur les groupes de news.
    It's not a very good idea to put your undisguised e-mail addresses in your
    signature, and even less so in the header of your messages posted on news
    groups.
     
    Clive Lumb, Jun 24, 2003
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. elnimbus

    elnimbus Guest

    hello


    thanks
     
    elnimbus, Jun 24, 2003
    #3
  4. A7V8X uses the promise SATA controller. The A7N8X uses the Silicon
    Image chip that can cause data corruption and eventually a system crash.
    I would choose the A7V8X if I could go back in time...
     
    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=F1or_Apellido?=, Jun 26, 2003
    #4
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.