1. This forum section is a read-only archive which contains old newsgroup posts. If you wish to post a query, please do so in one of our main forum sections (here). This way you will get a faster, better response from the members on Motherboard Point.

Had to roll back from 310.90

Discussion in 'Nvidia' started by Terry Pinnell, Jan 18, 2013.

  1. I updated my nVIDIA GeoForce 8800GT driver a week or so ago to version
    310.90. But I hit a major problem. I use FRAPS (mainly to record Google
    Earth tours) and the frame rate dropped from its typical 20-30 fps to an
    unacceptable 5-6 fps. Some googling last night revealed that it's a known

    So I used the Roll Back facility on this PC and am now using the driver
    which Win XP calls If I've got the hang of the conversion
    that means version 362.3 in nVidia terms, yes? Is that my best choice? If
    not, could someone give me a pointer to a more stable/reliable one pleased

    But to my dismay this roll back has not fixed the FRAPS problem. Yet I WAS
    using that version for many months with FRAPS with no problem.

    Anyone have any ideas what I should try next please?
    Terry Pinnell, Jan 18, 2013
    1. Advertisements

  2. Terry Pinnell

    Fierce Guppy Guest

    "Terry Pinnell" wrote in message
    XP should be calling it which equates to version 306.23
    You've gone back two versions. There is also 310.70. Assuming you have
    32-bit XP then this is the link:

    To date I've been lucky enough to have had no 3xx series driver instability
    issues, so I can't recommend one driver over another.
    When you install the nvidia drivers select the "Custom (Advanced)" option,
    click Next, then tick "Perform clean installation" and proceed with the
    install. I've had nasty desktop artefacts appear that no system restore
    point could fix.
    That's an interesting one. I'd right click on the logmeln mirror driver and
    disable it just to see if you gain FPS. It's a mirror driver which implies
    that it duplicates operations sent to the regular graphics card driver. This
    particular one sounds likes it's part of some remote desktop viewing
    software package, although the driver should only be sucking up resources
    when in use.
    Fierce Guppy, Feb 5, 2013
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.