1. This forum section is a read-only archive which contains old newsgroup posts. If you wish to post a query, please do so in one of our main forum sections (here). This way you will get a faster, better response from the members on Motherboard Point.

Longest path length from SDRAM controller to DRAM?

Discussion in 'Embedded' started by sendthis, Oct 16, 2007.

  1. sendthis

    sendthis Guest

    I'm trying to design a test setup to do radiation experiments on SDR
    for my thesis. The DRAM needs to be isolated from our control unit b/c
    worried about contaminating our results by having our control
    in there too - b/c then how do we know if it's the DRAM or
    else that fails.

    So my question is, what's the longest length I can run a ribbon cable
    (or other type of connection) and not having issues? Can I bring the
    clock down? We are using 20-24 inches of cabling. We decided maybe to
    use CAT6 cable?

    sendthis, Oct 16, 2007
    1. Advertisements

  2. sendthis

    CBFalconer Guest

    You can get a rough idea by the propagation time. 2 feet of cable
    will have a one-way propagation time in the order of 2 nanosecs,
    and a characteristic impedance in the order of 100 ohms. So
    ringing will be in the order of 250 MHz. The cures are proper
    matching and timing.
    CBFalconer, Oct 16, 2007
    1. Advertisements

  3. Someone with strong current hardware skills is sure to answer this better,
    but I think the length through ribbon cable is basically 0 inches. The
    timing is very fast and will be very susceptible to cross talk. Many
    current SDRAM designs even use trace length balancing to insure all the
    signals are available at the same time.

    You will most likely need another solution, possibly an RF shield can over
    the other circuitry.

    Not Really Me, Oct 16, 2007
  4. sendthis

    Tim Wescott Guest

    So, two feet of ribbon cable. Take a velocity factor of 0.66 for grins,
    which gives you an effective 3 foot free-space length. Then consider
    that the signals have to go there and get back.

    Hmm. That's 6ns, or just about 1/166MHz. And that's ignoring any nasty
    impedance bumps you may have in your connector and cable, not to mention

    What was your clock rate again?

    Did you check for a minimum clock rate on the data sheet? The last time
    I was around SDRAM there was a minimum not-to-be-exceeded clock rate,
    and it wasn't all that much lower than the maximum not-to-be-exceeded.


    Tim Wescott
    Wescott Design Services

    Do you need to implement control loops in software?
    "Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" gives you just what it says.
    See details at http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html
    Tim Wescott, Oct 16, 2007
  5. sendthis

    Jim Stewart Guest

    A stupid question.

    Are you exposing the SDRAM to radiation
    or are you measuring EMI from the SDRAM?
    Jim Stewart, Oct 16, 2007
  6. sendthis

    Tom Lucas Guest

    That's a bit harsh, although the poor chap seems unable to spell
    Either way the OP could probably get reasonable results by wrapping his
    controller up in aluminium foil or, more professionally, a metal
    enclosure with proper braided earthing. However, I believe they
    mentioned that they were expecting the device to fail so presumably they
    are testing for EMI succeptibility.
    Tom Lucas, Oct 17, 2007
  7. sendthis

    Jim Stewart Guest

    My apologies to the original poster and
    the group. My meaning was "I have a
    stupid question".
    Jim Stewart, Oct 17, 2007
  8. Forgive me for being a physicist but: what kind of radiation would that be?
    What kind of "isolation"?
    Ultimately, you never do. That's why people do stability checks, a.k.a.
    calibration runs, where they measure the effect of the experimental
    environment on the measurement devices themselves.
    I'll second the guess already voiced here before: zero. SDRAM signals
    aren't designed to travel on pretty much anything else than short(!),
    scrupulously designed traces on multi-layer PCBs.
    Hans-Bernhard Bröker, Oct 17, 2007
  9. sendthis

    sendthis Guest

    Well I'm willing to provide ANY clock rate. I'm trying 20 Mhz because
    that seemed like a reasonable clock speed to work with. The data sheet
    didn't specify a minimum clock speed but I would assume it would have
    to be at least fast enough to provide a refresh rate (~100kHz).
    sendthis, Oct 26, 2007
  10. sendthis

    sendthis Guest

    I'm exposing it to radiation. And I knew what you meant by "A stupid
    question" when I read it, but thanks for clarifying anyway.
    sendthis, Oct 26, 2007
  11. sendthis

    sendthis Guest

    When I mean isolated, I mean, "away from". The DRAM must be 19 inches
    away from the irradiation source.
    That's what I originally thought too, but people I asked (who don't
    necessarily have experience in the subject) said it seems reasonable
    to assume it's okay. We ended up using CAT5e cable for the cabling...
    sendthis, Oct 26, 2007
  12. sendthis

    sendthis Guest

    That seems reasonable. I'm using a 20 or 50Mhz clock but I can
    certainly slow it down or speed it up fairly easily. The cabling is
    made with twisted pair although they're not perfectly the same length.
    There's also a short length of it (to be reduced) that's using ribbon

    I guess I'll know soon enough if it works or not since we pressed
    ahead with building a test fixture. I'll let everyone know how it
    works out...


    sendthis, Oct 26, 2007
  13. sendthis

    sendthis Guest

    Well we've been playing with the test fixture for a while now. It
    doesn't appear to be working. Not sure if it's due to skew although
    we're compensating that with a PLL. We're also getting some voltage

    We're going to reduce the wire lengths and see if that helps. If so,
    then we'll need to redesign our test. If not, I don't know what to do.
    sendthis, Nov 6, 2007
  14. sendthis

    sendthis Guest

    Actually we manage to get it working. There's still some jitter and
    ringing but we hope to be able to clean that up with some tweaking.
    Thanks for the help.
    So if anyone ever needs to run DRAM over 20 inches of wire, use
    twisted pair and run it at a 10 Mhz clock... we have had some success
    over a 50Mhz clock...
    sendthis, Nov 13, 2007
  15. sendthis

    sendthis Guest

    Without termination we got it to run perfectly (passed some basic
    memory scans) on 4 inches of twisted pair at 66.66667 Mhz. It fails
    somewhere between 66.67Mhz and 75Mhz but it wasn't important to find
    exactly when it failed.

    On the longer cable, ~24 inches, it passes the memory scan at 20 Mhz
    without any type of termination.
    sendthis, Nov 15, 2007
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.