New K8WE Thunder (S2895) BIOS 105 Available

I was cruising the new Tyan site tonight, and I noticed a new 105 BIOS
for the K8WE Thunder (S2895) motherboard. It installed like a charm.
I don't know whether everybody already knew about it.

Enjoy!

Jim

 

In his posting of Sat, 12 May 2007, Jim writes
>I was cruising the new Tyan site tonight, and I noticed a new 105 BIOS
>for the K8WE Thunder (S2895) motherboard. It installed like a charm.
>I don't know whether everybody already knew about it.
>
>Enjoy!
>
>Jim
>

Jim, thanks for that but what are the advantages of installing these new
BIOS please. I purchased one of these boards 18 months ago.

Thanks
--
Richard

 

Richard wrote:
> In his posting of Sat, 12 May 2007, Jim writes
>> I was cruising the new Tyan site tonight, and I noticed a new 105 BIOS
>> for the K8WE Thunder (S2895) motherboard. It installed like a charm.
>> I don't know whether everybody already knew about it.
>>
>> Enjoy!
>>
>> Jim
>>
>
> Jim, thanks for that but what are the advantages of installing these new
> BIOS please. I purchased one of these boards 18 months ago.
>
> Thanks
After trying it out I found the following problems:
1. PCI-X slots don't work. Only the PCI and PCI Express were operational.
2. SCSI doesn't work
3. No boot option for net
4. Max speed on SATA was 1.5 Gb/s instead of 3.0 (Did I measure this
with a bit speedometer? No, I looked at the messages that Linux emits
while it's booting.)
After going back to 1.0.4, these problems went away. BTW, I am running
Linux 2.6.22.9 at the moment (Fedora Core 6) and updated numerous times
while 1.0.5 firmware was installed. All were the same. I don't know how
it works with Win, don't have it installed on this machine.
This makes me wonder about Tyan's QA.
Oh, I didn't lose any functionality going back to 1.0.4. So if you want
to cripple your computer, go ahead and install 1.0.5. Of course, your
results may be totally different. I can say that I tried it and it
didn't like it.

Bob

 

On Oct 13, 9:00 pm, Bob Gleitsmann <> wrote:

> After trying it out I found the following problems:
> 1. PCI-X slots don't work. Only the PCI and PCI Express were operational.

Bob,

I'm *sorry* about your problems, but I did not have them. I am using
*both* the PCI-X and PCI-E slots, and both continued to work.

> 2. SCSI doesn't work

I am also using the onboard SCSI, and it has continued to work.
However, I am *not* using the driver from Tyan; I am using a driver
from LSI Logic. I took a chance, and it worked. I have a SCSI tape
drive.

> 3. No boot option for net

I have *not* checked this.

> 4. Max speed on SATA was 1.5 Gb/s instead of 3.0 (Did I measure this
> with a bit speedometer? No, I looked at the messages that Linux emits
> while it's booting.)

I am using a 3ware/AMCC SATA-3 controller (9550 SX), so I am not
running this off the motherboard.

> After going back to 1.0.4, these problems went away. BTW, I am running
> Linux 2.6.22.9 at the moment (Fedora Core 6) and updated numerous times
> while 1.0.5 firmware was installed. All were the same. I don't know how
> it works with Win, don't have it installed on this machine.
> This makes me wonder about Tyan's QA.
> Oh, I didn't lose any functionality going back to 1.0.4. So if you want
> to cripple your computer, go ahead and install 1.0.5. Of course, your
> results may be totally different. I can say that I tried it and it
> didn't like it.

Sorry I recommended the new BIOS. Obviously it is *not* for
*everybody!*

Jim

 

On Oct 14, 9:08 am, Jim <> wrote:
> On Oct 13, 9:00 pm, Bob Gleitsmann <> wrote:
>
> > After trying it out I found the following problems:
> > 1. PCI-X slots don't work. Only the PCI and PCI Express were operational.
>
> Bob,
>
> I'm *sorry* about your problems, but I did not have them. I am using
> *both* the PCI-X and PCI-E slots, and both continued to work.
>
> > 2. SCSI doesn't work
>
> I am also using the onboard SCSI, and it has continued to work.
> However, I am *not* using the driver from Tyan; I am using a driver
> from LSI Logic. I took a chance, and it worked. I have a SCSI tape
> drive.
>
> > 3. No boot option for net
>
> I have *not* checked this.
>
> > 4. Max speed on SATA was 1.5 Gb/s instead of 3.0 (Did I measure this
> > with a bit speedometer? No, I looked at the messages that Linux emits
> > while it's booting.)
>
> I am using a 3ware/AMCC SATA-3 controller (9550 SX), so I am not
> running this off the motherboard.
>
> > After going back to 1.0.4, these problems went away. BTW, I am running
> > Linux 2.6.22.9 at the moment (Fedora Core 6) and updated numerous times
> > while 1.0.5 firmware was installed. All were the same. I don't know how
> > it works with Win, don't have it installed on this machine.
> > This makes me wonder about Tyan's QA.
> > Oh, I didn't lose any functionality going back to 1.0.4. So if you want
> > to cripple your computer, go ahead and install 1.0.5. Of course, your
> > results may be totally different. I can say that I tried it and it
> > didn't like it.
>
> Sorry I recommended the new BIOS. Obviously it is *not* for
> *everybody!*
>
> Jim

I wonder about the half speed SATA drive. I bought a seagate 320 sata
and found it was shipped from the factory with a jumper limiting it to
half speed. Removed the jumper, full speed operation, and quite
reliable. It looks like that's what we have here.

Dave

 

> I wonder about the half speed SATA drive. I bought a seagate 320 sata
> and found it was shipped from the factory with a jumper limiting it to
> half speed. Removed the jumper, full speed operation, and quite
> reliable. It looks like that's what we have here.

Midol,

I telephoned Seagate earlier about the settings of their SATA drives.
(I am running two of them in RAID 0 in a different machine.) They
said that they jumpered--at that time--*all* of their drives as SATA 1
because *most* people did *not* have SATA-2 controllers. Hitachi, on
the other hand, has no jumpers on their drives, and they will work
full-speed at either SATA 1 or SATA 2 depending on the controller.

Just some interesting trivia.

Jim

 

midol wrote:
> On Oct 14, 9:08 am, Jim <> wrote:
>> On Oct 13, 9:00 pm, Bob Gleitsmann <> wrote:
>>
>>> After trying it out I found the following problems:
>>> 1. PCI-X slots don't work. Only the PCI and PCI Express were operational.
>> Bob,
>>
>> I'm *sorry* about your problems, but I did not have them. I am using
>> *both* the PCI-X and PCI-E slots, and both continued to work.
>>
>>> 2. SCSI doesn't work
>> I am also using the onboard SCSI, and it has continued to work.
>> However, I am *not* using the driver from Tyan; I am using a driver
>> from LSI Logic. I took a chance, and it worked. I have a SCSI tape
>> drive.
>>
>>> 3. No boot option for net
>> I have *not* checked this.
>>
>>> 4. Max speed on SATA was 1.5 Gb/s instead of 3.0 (Did I measure this
>>> with a bit speedometer? No, I looked at the messages that Linux emits
>>> while it's booting.)
>> I am using a 3ware/AMCC SATA-3 controller (9550 SX), so I am not
>> running this off the motherboard.
>>
>>> After going back to 1.0.4, these problems went away. BTW, I am running
>>> Linux 2.6.22.9 at the moment (Fedora Core 6) and updated numerous times
>>> while 1.0.5 firmware was installed. All were the same. I don't know how
>>> it works with Win, don't have it installed on this machine.
>>> This makes me wonder about Tyan's QA.
>>> Oh, I didn't lose any functionality going back to 1.0.4. So if you want
>>> to cripple your computer, go ahead and install 1.0.5. Of course, your
>>> results may be totally different. I can say that I tried it and it
>>> didn't like it.
>> Sorry I recommended the new BIOS. Obviously it is *not* for
>> *everybody!*
>>
>> Jim
>
> I wonder about the half speed SATA drive. I bought a seagate 320 sata
> and found it was shipped from the factory with a jumper limiting it to
> half speed. Removed the jumper, full speed operation, and quite
> reliable. It looks like that's what we have here.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
I don't think that is what caused the problem as I had full speed with
the original v1.01 BIOS that came with the motherboard and also with V
1.04. I made no changes to the disk drive in getting the different results.