P5AD2, RAID 5, and more than 4 SATA drives ?

Discussion in 'Asus' started by Snake Djip, Feb 16, 2005.

  1. Snake Djip

    Snake Djip Guest


    I'm trying to figure out what is the cheapest way to build a PC with
    RAID 5 that can support up to 8 hard disks. I want to start with 4 or
    5 hard disks, and I want to be able to add same-size drives as time
    goes by. Note that the only reason that I want RAID 5 is for the
    protection it provides. The performance gain (or loss) is not
    important to me.

    Now, according to http://www.tomshardware.com/storage/20041119/raid5-01.html,
    it IS possible to have software RAID 5 on Windows XP.

    So, what I'm really trying to figure out is this : what's the lowest
    price I can pay in order to have a system that supports up to 8 hard
    disks in a RAID 5 configuration.

    I know I have the option of buying an 8-channel RAID 5 controller
    (adaptec for example). What I want to know is : is there a cheaper

    The P5AD2 motherboards support, it seems, up to 8 SATA hard disks.
    What's not clear is : can 8 SATA hard drives be set up as an 8-drive
    RAID 5 array with that motherboard, using Windows XP's software RAID 5
    implementation ? Also, how easy would it be to increase storage space
    by, for example, adding a fifth drive to a 4-drive array ? And so on
    up to 8 drives ?

    Snake Djip, Feb 16, 2005
    1. Advertisements

  2. Snake Djip

    Paul Guest

    Enter "Software raid5" here, then click "SR Discussion Forums".

    Here is a sample discussion about monster arrays

    Here is a cheap SIL3114 controller. $30 for four SATA ports.
    http://www.siimage.com/products/product.aspx?id=28 (SIL3114 page)

    Have fun,
    Paul, Feb 16, 2005
    1. Advertisements

  3. Snake Djip

    Dogger Guest

    I have the P5AD2 Premium mobo and love it. It actually has three separate
    onboard RAID controllers. The INTEL ICH6R controller which allows for up to
    4 SATA hard drives as RAID 0, or RAID 1. The second RAID controller is a
    Silicon Image 3114R controller whcih will provide RAID 0, 1, 1 0, RAID 5,
    and JBOD (Just a bunch of disks), again, using up to 4 SATA hard drives. The
    third controller is an Intel ITE8212 IDE RAIDcontroller which provides
    normal IDE or RAID 0,1,0+1, and JBOD using 2 Ultra DMA 133/100/66 IDE hard
    disks. Bang for the Buck tells me that this mobo goes a long way to meeting
    that need.

    As a bonus this awesome mobo also comes with two Firewire IEEE1394b
    connectors and PCI Express , two gigbit LAN controllers as well as a WIFI
    802.11g, 8 USB 2 ports.

    If you need more info, log onto the Asus website and download the manual.
    Hope this helps a bit.
    Dogger, Feb 16, 2005
  4. Snake Djip

    Mercury Guest

    Well, the least cost would be to use the connectivity exisitng as per
    Dogger's comments - to have system disc (hard mirrored) + n raid discs using
    windows soft raid 5.

    Windows software raid is very mature - it has been around since NT4 or

    I have run soft raid (1) on my server for a number of years (its a P2B-DS &
    all SCSI) and never had trouble with it. This includes a system rebuild a
    couple of years ago after the system disc dropped dead, several OS upgrades
    and several service packs along with a few power failures. (the raid config
    is auto detected on windows install).

    I dare say that the references Paul provided will show up some issues.

    If your system is not demonstrably highly stable, expect the same of your
    If the discs you use are not quaility """"


    Many will say soft raid performance sucks. Well, if you have a quality hard
    raid controller at hand and compare the two, yes it does but then they cost.
    However if you compare it to non raid - its a few % slower at most. This
    option is chosen for resilience + ECONOMY + sod the v.slight performance

    The issue you may have is having a bunch of discs on the SATA controllers in
    a non h/w RAID config (IE JBOD).

    If I where setting this up I would:
    - very thoroughly test system stability: memtest86 for 12 or more hours,
    prime95, verify CPU temps are as good as you can get, verify PSU voltages
    are stable under load with a fully configured system.
    - test each drive, surface scan, bulk file copies etc. MS used to have a
    SQLHDTest utility, but it does not work under XP / Server 2003 - it would be
    ideal... (it work under NT).

    All this testing is pre-emptive. I do it as standard on servers that are to
    run 24 x 7.

    I suggest you try it out with 3 discs - fail a disc by pulling out the PSU
    cable when off and learn how it behaves, how to rebuild the array etc. Don't
    forget that the SATA discs are not truly hot swap yet (perhaps they are with
    ICH6R). Also test performance as discs are added to the array - some RAID 5
    implementations are truly dumb and nead to re-read all sectors at the same
    position to rewrite the XOR data so they get slower with more drives.


    - Tim
    Mercury, Feb 16, 2005
  5. Snake Djip

    Snake Djip Guest

    Thanks for the replies.

    I've downloaded the mobo manual. It seems that all drive connector
    groups on the motherboard can be set as non-RAID, and I am guessing
    that this means that I could use all hard disks with XP software RAID.

    From what I understand, there are 8 SATA connectors on the board (for
    up to 8 SATA drives), and there are also 3 IDE connectors, 2 of which
    can be used for on-board hardware RAID, or not... This would mean a
    maximum of 6 IDE drives.

    Since I'm going to be using a DVD-Writer in this machine, and since
    I've read somewhere that it's not a good idea to connect an optical
    drive on the same connector as a HD, my conclusion is that this
    motherboard would theoretically let me connect 8 SATA HDs and 4 IDE
    HDs, for a total of 12.

    The first question that comes to my mind now is : can I mix
    same-capacity SATA and IDE drives in a XP software RAID setup ? What
    are the implications if it is possible ?

    The second question is : since I'm using XP to control the RAID array,
    this means XP has to be on a separate drive (does it?). Should I buy
    a 10k drive for the OS, and regular 7.2k drives for the data ?

    My last question is : what's involved when I decide that I want to add
    another drive to increase capacity ? Let's say I have 4 drives in my
    RAID array, and I decide to add a fifth one ? Is this at all possible
    without reformatting (and losing the data on the existing drives) ?

    3 questions, and really hoping for 3 answers :)

    Thanks again
    Snake Djip, Feb 16, 2005
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.