1. This forum section is a read-only archive which contains old newsgroup posts. If you wish to post a query, please do so in one of our main forum sections (here). This way you will get a faster, better response from the members on Motherboard Point.

Shopping for an LCD, looking for suggestions

Discussion in 'ATI' started by Jason Ash, Dec 19, 2004.

  1. Jason Ash

    Jason Ash Guest

    Here's the deal. My current 19" CRT seems to be failing, since I had
    an overloaded circuit in my house blow (not the circuit with the PCs, and
    PC/monitor etc all on UPS, but problem started then)

    I've got a built by ATI Radeon 9700Pro. I am planning to get an LCD
    through Dell (I already have Dell credit) I am looking at no smaller
    than a 17" and preferably a 19" or larger. I am looking at the following
    couple, and wonder if anyone has any experience with them.
    Planar PX191 19"
    Dell Ultrasharp 1905FP 19"
    Dell Ultrasharp 1704FPV 17"
    Dell Ultrasharp 2001FP 20"

    I'll take other suggestions as well. Please don't say to just get the
    20", as I need to get this "approved" by the wife as well. She's only
    letting me shop like this due to the (very visible) problem with my CRT.

    A few notes and restrictions on whatever I get:
    Must have DVI input. This is non-negotiable
    I use my PC primarily for game playing, Half Life 2, Battlefield 1942,
    etc, so a low response time is preferred.
    I would like a true 24bit display, not 16bit dithered to 24.

    Any ideas?
    Reply to for SPAM only

    All others use:
    m0ng0lh0rde @ ukonline . co . uk

    Remove spaces to send
    Thank you
    Jason Ash, Dec 19, 2004
    1. Advertisements

  2. Jason Ash

    Gareee© Guest

    Yep, stick with a crt.. response time is faster, and colors are more
    accurate.. plus they are 1/5th of the price.

    I've yet to see a flat screen I could live with and every single digital
    artist I know of refuses to use a flat screen because of refresh and color
    Gareee©, Dec 20, 2004
    1. Advertisements

  3. Jason Ash

    Gordon Scott Guest

    If your main purpose is playing games LCD is NOT the way to go.
    CRT monitors remain the best for gameplay, if any store/salesman tells
    you differently they are lying through their teeth.

    Gordon Scott, Dec 20, 2004
  4. Jason Ash

    Jason Ash Guest

    I also plan to try to use dual monitor until my current CRT up and quits.
    Due to desk space, I am unable to fit two CRTs on the desk, which is
    another reason for shopping for a LCD.

    Reply to for SPAM only

    All others use:
    m0ng0lh0rde @ ukonline . co . uk

    Remove spaces to send
    Thank you
    Jason Ash, Dec 20, 2004
  5. Jason Ash

    SteveK Guest

    First remove the monitor from the ups system and see if the problem goes
    away - then buy another monitor..
    SteveK, Dec 20, 2004
  6. Jason Ash

    nazgul Guest

    Le Sun, 19 Dec 2004 17:49:45 -0600, Jason Ash
    I have dell laptop costing very much.
    The display is 16/9 ratio; playing dvd flawlessly, but not tried
    Yes, you should keep this manufacturer to go and get one of the
    nazgul, Dec 20, 2004
  7. Jason Ash

    Andi Cole Guest

    I'm using a BENQ FP937s and it's the first (of three) LCD's that I've had
    that works well in fps games. CRT's I've had in the past all suffered from
    focus issues after a while, gave me migraines took up so much space.

    Don't believe the cynics here, LCD's are not bad at all nowadays. Make sure
    you have a refersh rate at an absolute maximum of 16ms, 25ms just won't cut
    it. 12ms is what my LCD is and there are some 8ms ones now. Unless your
    doing true colour photo work the LCD will be fine, might need some fine

    As for the Dells forget the 17" it's 25ms, the 19" is 20ms so is marginal,
    the 20" is 16ms so would be OK. However you can get 19" 12ms TFT's now the
    BENQ FP937 for example or a Philips 190X5FB.
    Andi Cole, Dec 20, 2004
  8. Jason Ash

    Jack Guest

    Before you buy anything, make certain your video card is not going bad.
    That was my trouble, my granddaughter's and a friends trouble, rather
    than the CRT itself.
    Jack, Dec 20, 2004
  9. Jason Ash

    Gareee© Guest

    Hey I'd move to a LCD in a minute, if I thought I;d get an advantage from

    Again, check any of the digital graphic developement, or digital photography
    newsgroups.. there isn;t even a debate on LCDs being up to par yet. The
    general consensus is that LCDs are get for low end consumer use, but just
    are not there yet for professional uses.

    There are color shift issues, refresh rate issues, and angle visibility
    issues that are just not acceptable for grpahic developement uses.

    Red needs to look "real world" red, not a close approximation.

    They are especially bad when you develop on one, and then display on a
    normat crt, and see many hue variances.

    As I said, check the various forums fore digital photography, 3d work and
    such, and you won't even consider a LCD yet.
    Gareee©, Dec 20, 2004
  10. Jason Ash

    Shawk Guest

    Agree on the Pro uses but the OP uses his PC primarily for game playing.
    A lot of LCD's are fast enough for that now. Shaun
    Shawk, Dec 20, 2004
  11. Jason Ash

    Gareee© Guest

    Yeah, but not with the newer video cards running hi res 100+ fps.
    Gareee©, Dec 20, 2004
  12. [This followup was posted to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati and a copy
    was sent to the cited author.]

    Check out www.tomshardware.com. Many good, full featured reviews. He
    checks response time not at just the 0-100% switching given in ads (and
    even then, usually over-optimistic), but also at lower levels. The
    switching time is much slower then. Also avoid overrated specs like
    contrast ratio. Usually given when comparing sunburn-level brightness to
    black. The real usable ratio is usually much lower. There is also an
    article explaining the marketing scams related to the above.

    As other have posted, try your monitor on another computer, or try
    another monitor on your computer. You need to verify that it is the
    monitor itself that is bad, and not the computer or video card.
    Andrew Rossmann, Dec 20, 2004
  13. Jason Ash

    TonyC Guest

    Just got myself a ViewSonic VX912 12ms 19" dual input. Makes my 19" Vision
    Master Pro 450 look crap in EVERY respect. Looks great, performs great.
    Happy chappie I am.

    TonyC, Dec 20, 2004
  14. Jason Ash

    Andi Cole Guest

    Yeah, but not with the newer video cards running hi res 100+ fps.

    Why? mines fine runing 100 fps in GTR.
    Andi Cole, Dec 20, 2004
  15. Jason Ash

    Andi Cole Guest

    Ah yes, someone who's actually looked at the results and not just read the

    Jason should get an LCD, save on desk space and power.
    Andi Cole, Dec 20, 2004
  16. Jason Ash

    Malc Guest

    I've just bought a Sharp LL-171G-B and its excellent. Its 17" and only
    has 20ms response time, but its bright and there is no blurring at all.
    I think some of the LCD manufacturers are over-optimistic in their
    quoted response times - so don't go on this alone. There's a review at
    http://www.custompc.co.uk/ .

    Malc, Dec 20, 2004
  17. Jason Ash

    Andi Cole Guest

    Good refence there.

    Take a look at the review of the BENQ FP783, it concludes along the lines
    of; a games monitor needs to be different to a graphics tool monitor. Benq's
    12ms and "sledgehammer approach to colours and whites" is ideal for gaming.

    So don't get confused by purists selecting the wrong monitor for gaming
    needs. A slow response time, and I think you need 16ms or faster, is no good
    for games, but below that you're gonna be amazed.
    Andi Cole, Dec 21, 2004
  18. Jason Ash

    T Shadow Guest

    For those that have owned Acer products.
    T Shadow, Dec 21, 2004
  19. Jason Ash

    RJT Guest

    Of those you mention, only the 2001FP comes close to being good for
    gaming. I've seen the panel - I've even owned the 23" version of what is
    technically the same panel - but it didn't please me. It's still a
    little choppy, so the may say it's 16ms, but you can see it's not as
    fast in refreshing as a CRT. I took mine back, and ended up buying a
    second hand SONY F520 - which makes me veeeery happy.

    Getting a TFT to display 24bit color as it is meant to be comes at a
    price: the better the color reproduction, the slower the panel's
    response. So you'll have to choose: if you want 24bit color and gaming,
    you NEED a CRT. If you want a TFT and gaming, you'll have to drop the
    24bit thing and then the BenQ FP71E+ is the best buy available. If you
    want to buy a TFT from Dell, I'd get the 2005FP. AFAIK It's a 20.1"
    widescreen (1680x1050) 16ms panel, and is currently on sale - cheaper
    than the 2001FP.
    RJT, Dec 21, 2004
  20. Been using a Dell 2001FP for nearly a year now (wow already!). All I have to
    say it is the BEST monitor I have ever had. It has worked flawlessly for any
    game I throw at it at any resolution up to 1600x1200. With the 16ms
    response time there is absolutely zero video smearing. The 16ms essentially
    equates to around 60 fps, so even if there is "smearing" it won't be visible
    to the naked eye. It has four inputs, one DVI, one 15-pin VGA, one S-Video,
    and one composite. I have two PC's and my XBOX attached to it. It even has
    an add-on speaker that snaps to it too. It can also be rotated easily if
    you're into desktop publishing and need that feature.

    The good thing is that Dell usually has excellent deals on it too. I got
    mine for around $750 and had a $100 off coupon for buying a Dell a year
    earlier (Xmas gift for my sister and her family). So, keep a lookout for
    deals and it will be a purchase you won't regret.
    HockeyTownUSA, Dec 22, 2004
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.