See other references about the 2500+ and the KT7A board in this NG. The 2 differences, besides clock speed, is that the 2500+ Barton has twice the L2 cache and supports SSE instructions. If you want the max performance out of it in the kt7a, you will need to change the default multiplier toI obviously don't understand much, but I assume the kt7a doesn't care that the new CPU could run a bus at 266Mhz. Will the higher clock speed be the only improvement? The 2500+ runs at 1.8Ghz.
I obviously don't understand much, but I assume the kt7a doesn't care that the new CPU could run a bus at 266Mhz. Will the higher clock speed be the only improvement? The 2500+ runs at 1.8Ghz.
tia
I obviously don't understand much, but I assume the kt7a doesn't care that the new CPU could run a bus at 266Mhz. Will the higher clock speed be the only improvement? The 2500+ runs at 1.8Ghz.
tia
Thanks for the advice Wes and DOH! to Doug--I will read more carefully in the futuer.
So I will definitely be getting a 2500. It's amazing how much info there is--from Wes on the ng alone there is more than enough. I'm amazed that there is a VIDEO on how to close the bridges!
Anyway, thanks very much.
Hulot
...
I just did the "operation" today, and lo - it was a success! It feels like it was pure luck cutting those traces though - even with a good magnifying glass, all I could do was pray I wasn't cutting too deep or something... Do people use a microscope on these operations? Evidently all it needs to cut a trace is a good scratch with an exacto blade...
Anyway, I'm now running my 2500 barton at 9X133, for a speed of 2266mhz. 10X133 would not even try to boot. I didn't try 9.5. I'm very pleased with this sweet $100 "new computer." Thanks Wes and all!
BTW, I upped the voltage to 1.66, just for the fun of it. It's idling now at 44degreesC. Am I correct in assuming that the same rules apply as with my ...